NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-26262
Irwin M. Lieberman, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Soo Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it used Track Inspectors D. Hershberger and S. Nilse
Milladore and Stevens Point, Wisconsin on February 3, 1983 (System File App.
M/800-46-B-167).
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, Furloughed Sectionmen J. B.
Nelson and M. L. Callows shall each be allowed pay at their respective rates
for an equal number of hours worked by Messrs. Hershberger and Nilsen in performing the work referre
OPINION OF BOARD: On February 3, 1983, Carrier, following a heavy snow fall,
assigned two track inspectors the task of clearing snow
from switches between Milladore and Stevens Point, Wisconsin, a distance of
some 31 miles. Claimants, both Sectionmen, were on furlough at the time and
available and qualified to do the work.
Rule 45(j) of the Agreement provides:
"(j) Laborers may be employed as required
to do excavating or back filling and similar
miscellaneous pick and shovel work."
Appendix M of the Agreement provides in pertinent part:
"(2) It will be the duty of the track
inspector to inspect his district and advise the
section foreman of repair work requiring attention. The inspector will also perform minor
repair work such as replacing missing bolts,
cleaning crossing flangeways and servicing
switch lamps."
The Organization argues that the work of shoveling snow from
switches is the type of work contemplated by Rule 45(j) and is therefore
reserved to laborers. In addition it is observed that the provisions of
Appendix M enumerates the duties of track inspectors and makes no mention of
snow removal or other shoveling work. It is urged further that the parties,
in negotiating Appendix M, intended to prevent track inspectors from becoming
roving maintenance forces usurping the work of section forces within their
districts.
Award Number 26674 Page 2
Docket Number MW-26262
Further, there is no need in this instance to look to exclusivity since the
terms of the the Agreement are clear and unambiguous, according to the Organization. Carrier states
Sectionmen exclusive rights to clean snow from switches, but also it has been
a long-standing practice for train crews to accomplish this task. Carrier
also states that there is nothing in Rule 45(j) that prevents an employe in
another classification from performing the work in question. Carrier also
notes that Appendix M is not an exclusive listing of minor repair work and
hence the inspectors are not precluded from performing the snow cleaning
activity.
The Board, after examining the record, has found no evidence to
counter Carrier's assertion that it has been a long-standing practice for
train crews to clean snow from switches. In addition, there is no evidence to
establish that the work is exclusively reserved to Sectionmen, by either
practice or rule. The reasoning in Third Division Award 21495 is directly
applicable to this dispute and is controlling:
"We have previously held that when there is a
jurisdictional question between employes of the
same craft, represented by the same Organization, the burden of establishing the exclusive
right to the work in question is even more
heavily on Petitioner; see Awards 13083, 13198
and 20425. In this dispute the key question is
not only whether the work should have been
performed by an hourly rated employe but also
whether it indeed was work reserved to the craft
under the Agreement. There is no persuasive
evidence on either point in this record and
therefore the claim must be denied."
For the reasons indicated, the Claim must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
Award Number 26674 Page 3
Docket Number MW-26262
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J./"r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of November 1987.