Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 26841
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. SG-27259
88-3-86-3-347
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Ronald L. Miller when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company





(a) Carrier violated Rule #37 of the current Signalmen's Agreement when, on May 15, 1985, Carrier removed Signalman J. D. Knutti from the Seniority Roster of the Pitts
(b) Carrier should now restore Mr. Knutti on the Seniority Roster of the Pittsburgh 6 Lake Erie Railroad Company, Signal Department."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.






Form 1 Award No. 26841
Page 2 Docket No. SG-27259
88-3-86-3-347









On April 25, 1985, the Carrier notified the Claimant that:



Subsequently, the Carrier notified the Claimant that his name had been removed from the Seniority Roster because he did not respond during the fourteen (14) day period that started when the Claimant received the April 25, 1985 letter of recall.

The Organization contends that the fourteen (14) day period would not start until the Claimant receives a permanent position by a bulletin. However, this position incorpo states only "... for a permanent position ..."; no mention is made of "... by a bulletin." The Carrier's letter complied with the requirement of Rule 37. It put the Claimant on notice that his seniority entitled him to hold a regular permanent position a respond within fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of the recall letter. This Board does not have the authority to alter Rule 37 by adding language to achieve the Organization's purpose.

The Carrier complied with the requirements of Rule 37 and the Claimant failed to return to servi seniority under Rule 37 is self-executing. The Claimant was removed properly from the seniority list. This portion of Rule 37 is clear, self-executing and must be enforced as written by the parties.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
      Nancy J. - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of February 1988.