Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 26932
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-26515
88-3-85-3-253
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Peter R. Meyers when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The five (5) days of suspension imposed upon Repairman R. M. Rossiter for alleged 'insubordination in refusal to obey direct orders given by A. J. Venturini, Foreman West End, at Canton M.W. Shop, Canton, Ohio' was arbitrary, capricious, unwarranted and on the basis of unproven charges (System Docket CR-774-D).

(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant is employed as a repairman at its Canton, Ohio shop. On the morning of November 22, 1983, Claimant was first instructed to remove the engine from Machine ME 5045 as soon as possible. Claimant did not remove the engine until sometime on November 23, 1983, after receiving further instructions to remove the engin investigation in connection with the charges:


Form 1 Award No. 26932
Page 2 Docket No. MW-26515
88-3-85-3-253



The hearing was held on January 12, 1984, and as a result, Claimant was assessed a five-day suspension. The Organization thereafter filed a claim on Claimant's behalf, challenging the suspension.

This Board has reviewed the evidence and testimony in this case, and we find that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant was guilty of insubordination. Therefore, the claim must be sustained.

The Carrier presented only one witness, and his testimony was inconsistent and did not constitut





                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        Nancy J. -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of March 1988.