Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27093
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-26744
88-3-85-3-613
The Third Divisiin consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Peter R. Meyers when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company
(Firmerly The Pittsburgh and West Virginia Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned junior
Carpenter C. L. Gardner, Jr. to perform overtime service on August 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 27, 1984 instead of using Carpenter G. L.
Whitaker who was senior, available and willing to perform that service
(Carrier's File MW-ROK-84-12).
(2) Carpenter G. L. Whitaker shall be allowed eleven (11) hours of
pay at his time and one-half rate."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant is employed as a carpenter by Carrier, in its Bridge and
Building Department. Beginning on August 13, 1984, Carrier used an outside
contractor to perform bridge repair work at West Liberty, Pennsylvania. In
connection with the repair work, Carrier assigned Carpenter Gardner to work as
a flagman; the assignment included overtime work. The Organization thereafter
filed a claim on Claimant's behalf, challenging the assignment of such overtime to Carpenter Gardner
Form 1 Award No. 27093
Page 2 Docket No. MW-26744
88-3-85-3-613
This Board has reviewed the evidence in this case, and we find that
the Organization has not met its burden of proof. The Organization has not
presented sufficient evidence to support its argument that Claimant should
have been assigned the overtime. There is no evidence that the Carrier acted
in such a way as to avoid the seniority provisions of the Agreement. Therefore, the claim must be de
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of May 1988.