Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27117
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. M'd-26604
88-3-85-3-350
The Third Divisija consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee L~iL Veraon when award was rendered.

(Brnthrrh.ond if Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim if the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The thirty (30) calendar days of suspension imposed upon Trackman D. J. Shine for alleged violation of Rule of Conduct 'C' and Safety Rule 4002 on March 20, 1984 was arbitrary, on the basis of unproven charges and in violation of the Agreement (System File NEC-BMWE-SD-886D).

(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



On March 21, 1984, Claimant was notified to appear for a trial on March 26, 1984, in connection with the following charges:




Form 1 Award No. ?7117
Page 2 Docket Nj. MW-?6604
88-3-85-3-350



The trial was held as scheduled on March 26, L984. Subsequently, on April 6, 1984, the Claimant was assessed the discipline now on appeal before the Board. The Claimant resigned effective April 8, 1984.

After reviewing the record, the Board concludes there is substantial evidence to support the charges against the Claimant. This consisted of testimony of two witnesses w on the Claimant's breath along with unusually belligerent behavior. The hearing officer found this testimony credible and probative. There is no basis to disturb these findings.

Under similar circumstances, the Board has upheld discipline, including dismissal. The Carrier i a supervisor's otherwise credible and probative observations as to whether someone is under the influence of alcohol. Moreover we find no basis to the argument that the Claimant failed to receive a fair and impartial hearing.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest: i
Nancy J er - Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of May 1988.