Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27117
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. M'd-26604
88-3-85-3-350
The Third Divisija consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee
L~iL
Veraon when award was rendered.
(Brnthrrh.ond if Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Nat i)naI 2ai[r)ad Passenger Corporation - (Amtrak)
"irtheast Cirridor
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim if the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The thirty (30) calendar days of suspension imposed upon
Trackman D. J. Shine for alleged violation of Rule of Conduct 'C' and Safety
Rule 4002 on March 20, 1984 was arbitrary, on the basis of unproven charges
and in violation of the Agreement (System File NEC-BMWE-SD-886D).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charges leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On March 21, 1984, Claimant was notified to appear for a trial on
March 26, 1984, in connection with the following charges:
"Violation of the following Amtrak rules:
Rule of Conduct 'C' which reads: 'Reporting for
work under the influence of alcoholic beverages
or narcotics, or the use of alcoholic beverages
while on or subject to duty or on Company property is prohibited.
Form 1 Award No. ?7117
Page 2 Docket Nj. MW-?6604
88-3-85-3-350
Safety Rule 402 which reads in part: 'Narcotic
medication, rjntriLLed drugs and/or alcoholic
beverage must nit be used by, or be in the
possession if
nay
employee while on duty or
within 8 hours hefire reputing for duty...' iu
that while ),i duty at Brill Interloekiag on
March 20, 1984, at approximately 9:00 PM, you
were observed to have the strong smell of fresh
alcohol on your breath."
The trial was held as scheduled on March 26, L984. Subsequently, on April 6,
1984, the Claimant was assessed the discipline now on appeal before the Board.
The Claimant resigned effective April 8, 1984.
After reviewing the record, the Board concludes there is substantial
evidence to support the charges against the Claimant. This consisted of testimony of two witnesses w
on the Claimant's breath along with unusually belligerent behavior. The
hearing officer found this testimony credible and probative. There is no
basis to disturb these findings.
Under similar circumstances, the Board has upheld discipline, including dismissal. The Carrier i
a supervisor's otherwise credible and probative observations as to whether
someone is under the influence of alcohol. Moreover we find no basis to the
argument that the Claimant failed to receive a fair and impartial hearing.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: i
Nancy J er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of May 1988.