Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27298
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-26449
88-3-85-3-183
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation
( (Amtrak - Northeast Corridor)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The sixty (60) days of suspension imposed upon Welder Helper W.
F. Gibson for alleged violation of Rule 'L' of Amtrak's Rules of Conduct was
arbitrary, on the basis of unproven charges and in violation of the Agreement
(System File NEC-BMWE-SD-795D).
(2) The claimant's record shall be cleared of the charge leveled
against him and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
In this case, the Carrier, primarily relying upon the testimony of
two witnesses, concluded that the Claimant was asleep while on duty and that
he had done no work on the project to which he had been assigned.
We have carefully reviewed the lengthy transcript of the Hearing held
on this matter and we have considered the Organization's vigorous contentions.
The Organization suggests that the Carrier fatally erred because it deprived
the Claimant of his due process rights in addition to not proving that the
Claimant was sleeping on duty.
We do not find that the Claimant was deprived of his basis rights.
While certain events and matters might have been handled differently, we note
that the Claimant was well-defended and that appropriate issues were pursued
to a reasonable conclusion.
Form 1 Award No. 27298
Page 2 Docket No. MW-26449
88-3-85-3-183
With respect to the merits, there is substantial evidence to support
the Carrier's findings and the Claim, therefore, is denied.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. v - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of August 1988.