Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27416
 THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MS-28043
 88-3-87-3-646
 (Karen S. Bly
 PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of Karen S. Bly (561) that:

 (a) Carrier violated the provisions of the current Clerks' Agreement at Winslow, Arizona when it refused to provide a copy of the new contract booklet, FORM 2633 STD., AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND ITS OFFICE, STATION, TOWER AND STOREHOUSE EMPLOYES OF THE CRAFT OR CLASS REPRESENTED BY THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HAND
(b) Carrier has stated that many rules of the current Clerks' Agreement have been changed or mod information to its clerical forces, and

 (c) Carrier shall be required to provide the Claimant with a copy of the above form, effective April 10, 1986 reflecting all rule and appendix changes, and any other modifications of said agreement, and

 (d) Carrier has treated Claimant unjustly by withholding this information, and

 (e) Claimant Karen S. Bly shall now be compensated an amount (retroactive 60 days from the date for each day after October 21, 1986 that the violation continues; to be determined by this Honorable
(f) Claimant Karen S. Bly shall now be compensated interest payable at the prevailing prime rate and any other damages and awards deemed proper by this Honorable Board."

 FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

 The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

 This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 27416
 Page 2 Docket No. MS-28043
 88-3-87-3-646

 As Third Party in interest, the Transportation Communications Union was advised of the pendency of this dispute and filed a Submission with the Division.

 The facts indicate that no conference was held as required by Rule 47 of the Agreement and the Railway Labor Act. For the reasons set forth in Third Division Award 26749, the Claim must be dismissed.

 Finally, even if the merits could be reached, we can find nothing in the applicable Agreement between the Carrier and the organization which supports the Claimant's position that such Agreement was violated.




                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
      Nancy J. - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of August 1988.