Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27594
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-27108
88-3-86-3-162
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr., when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned a junior foreman to perform overtime service on November 18, 1984 instead of calling and using Foreman R. J. Jacques who was senior, available and willing to perform that service (Syste
(2) Foreman R. J. Jacques shall be allowed seven (7) hours of pay at his time and one-half rate."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant is an MW Track Foreman. On November 18, 1984, the Carrier called a Foreman junior to the Claimant for an overtime assignment piloting a tamper machine. The Organization argues that the Claimant was improperly denied this overtime work. The Organization cites Rule 17, which reads as follows:





The Claimant had been out of service from 1981 until October 22, 1984. He did not take and pass an examination on the Book of Rules and Timetable Special Instruction until November 18, the Claimant was not qualified to be called for the overtime work. The Carrier refers to its Transportation Department Rule 801 which states,
Form 1 Award No. 27594
Page 2 Docket No. MW-27108
88-3-86-3-162

"Track car drivers must satisfactorily pass the required annual examination covering rules." Whether the Claimant was permitted to perform piloting work during the brief period following his return to work and before the overtime assignment was not clearly established.

The Board finds that the Carrier properly found the Claimant not "qualified", pending his comple and an operating Rule, the former must prevail. Here, however, the Board finds no such conflict. Rule 17 applies only to "qualified" employees.






                        By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        Nancy J/Y6er - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of October 1988.