Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27598
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-27416
88-3-86-3-659
The Third Division. consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka 6 Santa Fe Railway Company



(1) Carrier violated the rules of the current Clerks' Agreement at Chanute, Kansas commencing August 6, 1985, when it wrongfully disqualified D. R.-Shepard from Control Clerk Position No. 6290, and

(2) Claimant D. R. Shepard shall now be returned to Control Clerk Position No. 6290 and compensated eight (8) hours' pay at the pro rata rate of $101.43 for each work day Claimant is wrongfully withheld from Control Clerk Position No. 6290, in addition to any other compensation Claimant may have received as a result of such violation."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Upon being displaced from his position, Claimant attempted to displace on a currently occupied C to be a qualified typist and stenographer. Upon the Claimant's request to displace, he was given typing and stenography tests. There is no dispute that he failed to pass both tests.




Form 1 Award No. 27598
Page 2 Docket No. CL-27416
88-3-86-3-659
a new position or bulletined vacancy, be allowed 45 work
ing days in which to qualify, and failing, shall retain
all their seniority rights and may bid on any bulletined
position but may not displace any other employe."
As such rules have been previously interpreted, the prerequisite to a
fixed period in which employees may "qualify" is that they come to the posi
tion with "sufficient fitness and ability." The Carrier determined here,
based on the Claimant's deficiencies in typing and stenography, that he did
not have such required skill and ability. In view of this, the Board has no
basis to question the Carrier's discretionary judgment, especially where there
is no dispute as to the Claimant's inability to furnish proof of the necessary
skills.

The record includes varying contentions by the Organization and the Carrier as to the typing and stenography skills of the incumbent employee who would have been displaced, as well as whether or not such skills were actually employed in the position. Without resolving such differing contentions, the Board nevertheless concludes that the-Carrier's action was in line with its established criteria for the position and was not shown to be arbitrary or discriminatory. As stated in Third Division Award 26370:








                              By Order of Third Division


                    01


Attest:
        Nancy J. - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 27th day of October 1988.