Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27620
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MS-26941
88-3-85-3-724
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert W. McAllister when award was rendered.
(Richard L. Stone
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Consolidated Rail Corporation
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"My claim for back pay for time held from Bridge Operator position
and position on the Bridge and Building Dept. roster."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On December 17, 1985, the Claimant served notice on the Third Division of his intention to file
back pay for "time held from Bridge Operator position and position on the
Bridge and Building Department roster."
The Carrier argues the Claimant's Statement of Claim does not state
the question involved nor does it describe the nature of the dispute. The
Carrier also submits that the Board does not have jurisdiction because the
Claim was not progressed as required by the Railway Labor Act under the applicable Collective Bargai
Section 153, First (i) of the Railway Labor Act states in pertinent
part:
"The disputes between an employee
...
and a Carrier
...
growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements concerning
rates of pay, rules or working conditions,
...
shall
be handled in the usual manner up to and including
the chief operating officer of the carrier designated to handle such disputes; but failing to reach
Form 1 Award No. 27620
Page 2 Docket No. MS-26941
88-3-85-3-724
an adjustment in this manner, the disputes may be
referred to
...
the appropriate division of the Ad
justment Board
...
The record clearly establishes this Claim was never discussed on the
property. The above quoted requirements of the Railway Labor Act are not permissive. This Board has
must progress the dispute in accordance with Section 153, First (i). Herein,
absent any evidence the Claimant's appeal was handled in the usual manner before being presented to
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: !I
Nancy J D Ker - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of November 1988.