Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27675
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. SG-26877
89-3-85-3-652
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas Railroad Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the Brother
hood of Railroad Signalmen on the Oklahoma, Kansas and
Texas Railroad Co.:

Claim on behalf of Brother J. C. Gatz for 120 hours pay at his straight time rate of pay account of the Carrier's violation of the Signalmen's Agreement, particula (dated 11-16-71) when it did not grant him a five week vacation for the year 1985. Carrier file: 2619-OKT."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This is a dispute over vacation entitlements. The Claimant had been employed by the former Rock Island Railroad as a Diesel Electrician from February, 1952 until March 31, 1980. On June 4, 1980, the Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas Railroad Company (OKT) began interim operations over the St. Joseph, Missouri-Dallas, Texas track of the former Rock Island Railroad. On January 31, 1981, he was hired by the OKT in the position of Assistant Signalman. When the OKT ceased operations on this line, the Claimant was terminated, effective December 31, 1981. He was again employed by the OKT on November 1, 1982, at the time that the OKT commenced operations again over former Rock Island track, and he was assigned as a Signalman on February 24, 1983. On July 19, 1984, the Claimant retired from the OKT and received two weeks vacation pay. The controllin was hired under the March 4, 1980 Agreement ("Miami Accord") and would be entitled to have former years of service used in calculating vacation days.
Form 1 Award No. 27675
Page 2 Docket No. SG-26877
89-3-85-3-652

The "Miami Accord" to which the Carrier and the Organization were parties is a Labor Protective Agreement that provided for the orderly hiring of former Rock Island employees. In the matter before us, the following provisions of that Agreement are pertinent:








Form 1
Page 3

Award No. 27675
Docket No. SG-26877
89-3-85-3-652

In carrying out the purposes of this section, the purchasing carriers shall first utilize existing seniority rosters applicable to the appropriate craft and seniority district for the lines and territories involved in fulfilling employment needs in connection therewith.

4. Notification of Hiring -- When a carrier determines that it needs additional employees under this Article, such carrier shall notify the labor organizations representing employees of the Rock Island or Milwaukee of its specific needs and advise them exactly where and how eligible employees of the craft needed from the Rock Island or Milwaukee should apply for such vacancies. Eligible employees of the Rock Island or Milwaukee interested in such vacancies shall have the responsibility of applying to the carrier for vacancies in the manner described by the carrier. An employee shall have 7 days to apply after receipt of notice from the carrier or the organization or 20 days after the labor organization has received notice from the carrier, whichever occurs first, subject to paragraph 9 hereof. To the extent that the carrier has determined a need for additional employees under this Article, applicants will be required to meet those physical and rules standards which the carrier applies to its own employees on reexamination. The applicant's seniority in the appropriate craft and seniority district on the bankrupt carrier will prevail if the number of qualified applicants exceeds the carrier's determined need for additional employees. Bankrupt carrier employees who are in service with a bankrupt carrier at the time of interim operation or purchase and who are hired on the commencement of operations by a purchasing carrier pursuant to this Agreement will be presumed qualified physically and purchasing carrier will have the burden of proof if it wishes to challenge such qualifications.

Those employees who are subject to examination on purchasing carrier's operating book of rules may be required to pass a re-examination on those rules.
Form 1 Award No. 27675
Page 4 Docket No. SG-26877
89-3-85-3-652

















Prior to the Claimant's reemployment with the OKT on November 1, 1982, the various Organizations, including the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (BRS) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on October 26, 1982, modifying the application of the "Miami Accord" to OKT operations. Relevant to our deliberations in this matter is Section (2) of the October 26, 1982 Memorandum which reads:



On November 3, 1982 the OKT and BRS signed an Agreement (No. DP-30OKT). Particularly relevant to III and IV:
Form 1 Award No. 27675
Page 5 Docket No. SG-26877
89-3-85-3-652



          The Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas Railroad Company is the territory of former Rock Island trackage extending from Fort Worth, Texas, Northward to and including Salina, Kansas.


                        III.


          Consistent with the Carrier's legal requirements the Carrier will use as a source of 'first right of hire' a list of eligible employees who were employed by the former OKT Railroad Company on December 31, 1981. Positions not filled by former OKT employees will be bulletined to list of employees furnished by the Rock Island General Chairman.


                        IV.


          Effective with assignment to a position by bulletin, and first day worked thereon, Rock Island employees hired pursuant to the March 4, 1980 Agreement will be considered as having severed their employment relationship with the Rock Island Railroad."


The Board has carefully reviewed and considered the various contentions, submissions and awards review that certain contentions and materials have been presented that were not submitted or discussed on the property. Therefore, these may not be considered by this Board. Wi the parties' grounds for disagreeing are understandable in view of the multiple agreements that, in dispute. In its simplest terms, had the question only been whether the "Miami Accord" was applicable to the claim, the organization's claim likely would have been sustained. However, such is not the case.

We find ourselves in agreement with the Carrier on the substance of this matter. The Claimant had been employed by the former Rock Island Railroad Company until March 3 the OKT, it was in the status of an new employee in the Signalman craft. The record shows that he was hired only after there were no former Rock Island Signalman available with first right-of-hire under the "Miami Accord." We find that the "Miami Accord" covered individuals with seniority in the appropriate crafts and senior Accordingly, employees, such as the Claimant, hired outside of the appropriate craft, did not benefit from the "Miami Accord" provision.
Form 1 Award No. 27675
Page 6 Docket No. SG-26877
89-3-85-3-652

When the Claimant was again hired in November 1982, it was pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between the OKT and the various organizations execut
        For all of the foregoing, we must deny the claim.


                        A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        fancy J. D eyes Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of January 1989.