Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27727
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28014
89-3-87-3-579
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-10200) that:
(a) Carrier violated the Agreement at Topeka, Kansas, when it
removed Joseph H. Rodriquez Jr. from service as result of formal investigation
held on May 14, 1986, and
(b) Joseph H. Rodriquez Jr. shall now be reinstated to Carrier's
service with all rights unimpaired and compensated for all time lost from May
14, 1986 forward."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
At the time of the occurrence giving rise to the dispute herein,
Claimant, with a seniority date of May 7, 1973, in the Information Systems
Department Seniority District, was regularly assigned to a Machine Operator
position, Topeka, Kansas.
On March 7, 1986, Claimant was notified to report for a formal investigation on March 24, 1986:
...concerning report that you have failed to
protect your regular assignment as Machine Operator
commencing 3:00 PM, Monday, March 3, 1986, so as to
determine the facts and place responsibility, if
any, for possible violation of Rules 2, 13, 14, 15
and 16 of the General Rules for the Guidance of
Employes, Form 2626 Standard."
Form 1 Award No. 27727
Page 2 Docket No. CL-28014
89-3-87-3-579
The investigation was postponed and was conducted on May 14, 1986.
Following the investigation, Claimant was dismissed from Carrier's service by
notice dated May 30, 1986.
The Rules cited in the notice of March 7, 1986, were quoted in the
transcript of the investigation, and are cited in the record before this
Board. They will not be repeated here.
In the investigation of May 14, 1986, it was developed that Claimant
was involved in a shoot-out with an off-duty Policeman of Topeka, Kansas, on
February 27, 1986, and was wounded and hospitalized for a gun-shot wound. He
was under police custody while hospitalized. He was released from the hospital on March 31, 1986, an
The Carrier contends that Claimant did not request permission to be
off from his assignment commencing March 3, 1986, and was absent without leave.
The record before the Board also shows that Claimant was subsequently
sentenced to a prison term of 3 to 20 years for his involvement in the shootout on February 27, 1986
This Board has held that incarceration is not a valid excuse for not
protecting an assignment. We consider Claimant's being in police custody in
the same category as incarceration. The prison sentence was not a valid reason for a leave of absenc
There is no proper basis for the Board to interfere with the discipline imposed by the Carrier.<
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
i~j~'
ancy J. -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of March 1989.