Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27733
THIRD DIVISION
Docket No. MW-27060
89-3-86-3-111
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it laid off the members
of Extra Gangs 6501 and 6507 (listed below) without benefit of five (5) work
days' advance notice (System File D-3-85/MW-11-85).
Gang 6501:
Samora, F. Sanchez, A. L.
Findbiner, J. D. Sanchez, R. G.
Lopez, J. E. Zoto, C.
Martinez, J. R. Diaz, S. S.
Saldivar, I. Mendoza, T.
Torrez, A. M. Morneo, L. B.
Zuniga, A. Arizqueta, A.
Tamayo,
M.
Jr. Gallegos, J. E.
Arambulo, J. I. Valdez, Jr., R. J.
Cano, D. Archuleta, Jr., M. E.
Carrillo, S. D. Barriga, G.
Diaz, B. S. Martinez, T. L.
Diaz, T. Torrez, J. M.
Ramirez, J. Hesli, D. J.
Gang 6507
Orenday, T. Buchanan, R. A.
Arreola, J. S. Garcia, J. R.
Loya, H. P. Kenick, Jr., M. T.
Molina, A. Lovato, E.
Sanchez,
M.
S. Luevano, J. P.
Sarinana, F. Salazar, R. G.
Suke, F. K. Canales, D.
Prieto, F. Sisneros, D. R.
Prieto, S. Mason, E. D.
Barriga, A. Picco, D. J.
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, Messrs. T. Orenday, E.
Lovato and J. Ramirez shall be allowed forty (40) hours of pay at their respective straight time rat
allowed sixteen (16) hours of pay at their respective straight time rates."
Form 1 Award No. 27733
Page 2 Docket No. MW-27060
89-3-86-3-111
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On November 27, 1984, Carrier layed off all employes in Extra Gangs
6501 and 6507. At issue here is whether Claimants received five working days',
notice (as required by Rule 12) of the impending layoff. If they did, the
case is denied. If they did not, some compensation may be due some of the
Claimants.
In its review of this case, the Board is persuaded that the following
chronology of events has taken place:
"1. On Monday, November 12, 1983, verbal notice of
the layoff was given.
2. On November 19, 1984 verbal notice and written
notice of the layoff was given. The notice
was posted at 7:30 AM on November 19, before
the start of the work day. The layoff notice
excluded three people.
3. On Tuesday, November 27, 1984, all employes
in both gangs were layed off."
This Board has concluded from this review that Carrier made every
attempt possible to fulfill the five-day notice requirement. The employes
were made fully aware that a layoff was in the offing on November 12, 1984. A
notice was posted on the bulletin board and verbal notice was again given on
Monday, November 19, at 7:30 AM, before the work day began. This Board is of
the opinion that November 19, 1984, can appropriately be considered the first
day of notice, since the work day had not begun when the notice was posted and
the information it contained was relayed to the gangs. If November 19, 1984,
is considered day one of the notice, then November 27 is appropriate day five
and proper notice was given.
As to the separate part of this claim involving the Foreman and two
senior men who were excluded from the layoff notice, there is evidence that
they all worked beyond the November 27, 1984 deadline.
Form 1 Award No. 27733
Page 3 Docket No. MW-27060
89-3-86-3-111
The Board, on the whole record, has concluded that Carrier did not
violate the Agreement and the claim is denied.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J. De ~'- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of March 1989.