Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27790
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. SG-27369
89-3-86-3-663
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Dana E. Eischen when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Missouri Pacific Railroad Company (C&EI)



On behalf of H.F. Cartwright, Jr., for reinstatement to service effective July 29, 1985, with al amended, when it dismissed him from service account of alleged rules violation on July 18, 1985. General Chairman's file: 85-54-CEI. Carrier file: 217-57."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant was employed for some fourteen years as a Signal Maintainer for Carrier, headquartered at Yard Center, Dolton, Illinois. In the performance of his duties he was
At 12:01 A.M. on July 18, 1985, Claimant's driver's license was revoked by the State of Illinois intoxicated. Upon learning of this, the Carrier's Signal Supervisor called Claimant to his office for an interview. The Signal Supervisor verified that the driver's license had been revoked and, while he was talking to Claimant at 8:00 A.M., noticed that Claimant's eyes were bloodshot and he smelled of alcohol. The Signal Supervisor removed Claimant from service and on July 19 the Terminal Superintendent cited Claimant for Investigation into charges of failing to have a proper state driver's license and being under the influence when reporting for work on July 18, 1985. The Investigation subsequently was jointly postponed and held on July 26, 1985, following which Carrier found Claimant guilty and dismissed him from service.
Form 1 Award No. 27790
Page 2 Docket No. SG-27369
89-3-86-3-663

Timely appeal was taken and handled without resolution on the property, receiving final denial o appeal to the Board would have expired July 15, 1986, but Carrier granted a sixty-day extension at the Organization's request due to the death of the former General Chairman. The requested extension expired September 15, 1986, but the Notice of intent was not filed until October 1, 1986.

Even if, arguendo, the appeal to this Board were considered timely due to the mitigating circumstances, there is no proper basis for overturning Carrier's disciplinary action. We find no fatal procedural defects in the hearing process nor in the assessment of discipline. Claimant plainly was culpable for the loss of his driver's license and the preponderance of evidence supports Carrier's c that Claimant was offered an opportunity to enroll in the Employee Assistance Program to try and deal with his apparent alcohol problem, but he adamantly and defiantly refused to accept this offer. We are constrained to deny the Claim.






                              By Order of Third Division


Attest
      Nancy J. -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of March 1989.