Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27791
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-27412
89-3-86-3-653
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Dana E. Eischen when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Eastern Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The thirty (30) days of suspension imposed upon Machine Operator
P. A. Posas for alleged violation of Rule M810 on September 27, 1985, was
unjust and on the basis of unproven charges (System File MW-86-5/443-73-A).
(2) The dismissal of Machine Operator P. A. Posas for alleged
violation of Rule 604 on November 8, 1985, was harsh, unjust and excessive
(System File MW-86-17/445-56-A).
(3) The claimant's personal record shall be cleared of the charges
leveled against him, he shall be reinstated with seniority and all other
rights unimpaired and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Upon reporting for work on September 27, 1985, as Machine Operator
on Extra Gang 53, Claimant was told by his Foreman to report to a derailment
site at East Bernard and help laborers lay track. Claimant apparently had
with him a written doctor's statement returning him to service from a short
medical leave of absence. According to his testimony, Claimant told the
Foreman he still felt unable to perform hard physical labor but the Foreman
refused to discuss the matter and again ordered him to go to the derailment
site and lay track. Claimant did not report as directed but instead went home
and did not work or receive compensation for that day. He was suspended effective September 28, 1985
Form 1 Award No. 27791
Form 2 Docket No. MW-27412
89-3-86-3-653
a 30-day suspension without pay. The Organization filed a claim on December
4, 1985, seeking removal of that discipline. While the first claim was
pending appeal, Claimant failed to report for work on November 8, 1985, a
regularly scheduled work day. Claimant made no attempt to contact the Foreman
and he did not receive proper authorization to be off work. Carrier cited him
for a violation of Rule 604 and, at the hearing, Claimant admitted that he was
knowledgeable of the requirements of the Rule but failed to seek authorization
for his absence on November 8 because he had a history of problems with this
Foreman and he had already bid off Gang 53 to work on another gang commencing
November 12, 1985. Following that investigation, Carrier terminated Claimant
and the present claim was filed seeking reversal of the termination. The two
claims remained unresolved throughout handling on the property until appeal to
this Board.
The Organization raised a number of procedural objections regarding
the handling of the disciplinary action. We have reviewed the record and find
these objections are not well-founded and/or they were raised de novo on
appeal to the Board. On the merits, the record does show sufficient evidence
of culpability by Claimant, although the incident of September 27, 1985, is
somewhat mitigated by the cloudy medical issue. Clearly Claimant's failure to
follow procedures and his border-line insubordination to his Foreman cannot be
condoned. He must understand that such conduct is unacceptable and exposes
him to appropriate disciplinary action, including possible discharge. In all
of the circumstances, however, this Board concludes that termination in this
case is excessive. Accordingly, we shall restore Claimant to service with
seniority unimpaired but without backpay.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest
~~.~,.
' Nancy J er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of March 1989.