Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 27865
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28342
89-3-88-3-107
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Paul C. Carter when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEMENT OF
CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-10251) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement at Kansas City, Kansas when it
removed R. R.
McCoy
from service on February 26, 1987, and
2.
Ms.
R. R.
McCoy
shall now be restored to service with Carrier
with all rights unimpaired and with pay for all time lost beginning February
27, 1987, forward."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to-said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
At the time of the occurrence giving rise to the dispute herein,
Claimant, with a seniority date of August 25, 1978, was the regularly assigned
occupant of Traffic Controller (PAD) Position No. 5012, at a location referred
to in the record as Turner Depot, Kansas City Yard, with assigned hours 11:59
P.M. to 7:00 A.M., Thursday through Monday.
On January 29, 1987, Claimant was notified to report for a formal
Investigation scheduled for 9:30 A.M., February 9, 1987:
"to develop the facts and place responsibility, if
any, in connection with possible violation of
General Rules A and B, and Rule 26, General Code of
Operating Rules, effective October 28, 1985, concerning your allegedly allowing yard engine 1565 to
enter west end R-27 track (1027) through remote
Form 1 Award No. 27865
Page 2 Docket No. CL-28342
89-3-88-3-107
control switch in your charge after track was
blocked out under Blue Flag protection, Kansas City
Yard, approximately 2:00 PM January 26, 1987."
The Investigation was postponed and started on February 24, 1987,
recessed to February 25, 1987, on which date it was completed. On February
26, 1987, Claimant was removed from service.
Rules A and B and Rule 26, General Code of Operating Rules, referred
to in the notice of January 29, 1987, and in the dismissal notice of February
26, 1987, are set forth in the record before the Board and will not be repeated here.
A copy of the Transcript of the Investigation completed on February
25, 1987, has been made a part of the record. Upon review we find that the
Investigation was properly conducted and that none of Claimant's Agreement
rights was violated.
There was substantial evidence in the Investigation, including the
statement of the Claimant, in support of the charge. A situation was created
that could have resulted in serious consequences. Severe discipline was
warranted. However, the Board finds that permanent dismissal was excessive.
We will award that Claimant be restored to service with seniority and all
other rights unimpaired, but without any compensation for time lost while out
of service. However, we will not order that Claimant be restored to the PAD
position occupied at the time of dismissal as we understand that the Carrier
has the prerogative to remove an employee from such a position at its discretion.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J. - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of May 1989.