Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28016
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28241
89-3-88-3-43
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Peter R. Meyers when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood


1. Carrier violated the Agreement Rules, particularly Rule 56, when under date of February 4, 1987, it dismissed Ms. Carmen Judice from the service of the Carrier on th and

2. Carrier shall be required to clear the record of Ms. Carmen Judice of all related charges and compensate her for all time lost with full seniority rights, vacation rights and all other conditions as provided for the current BRAC Agreement, effective with the date of January 23, 1987, the date Carrier held Claimant Carmen Judice from the service of the Carrier and continuing until such time a
FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant was employed as a Chief Clerk. On January 23, 1987, Claimant was directed to attend a f

Form 1 Award No. 28016
Page 2 Docket No. CL-28241
89-3-88-3-43







The hearing took place on January 29, 1987, and Claimant was dismissed from service. The Organization thereafter filed a claim on Claimant's behalf, challenging her dismissal.

This Board has reviewed the procedural arguments raised by the Organization, and we find them to
With respect to the substantive issue, this Board finds that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the finding that the Claimant is guilty of conduct unbecoming an employee when she threatened to inflict bodily harm to a Division Manager of the Carrier.

Once this Board has found that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the guilty finding, we next turn our attention to the type of discipline imposed. This Board will not set aside a Carrier's imposition of discipline unless we find it to have been unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious.

In the case at hand, the Claimant has been found guilty of making serious threats toward a managerial employee. That type of behavior has been found to be a dismissible offense on numerous occasions in the past. Given the nature of the wrongdoing, this Board cannot find that the action taken by the Carrier was unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious. Therefore, the claim must be denied.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest. Z

        Nancy J ~Oer - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of July 1989.