Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28027
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John E. Cloney when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it failed and refused to allow Trackman 0. K. Butler holiday pay for Washington's Birthday (February 17, 1986) (System File 90-16-862/11-1080-20-10).

(2) Claimant 0. K. Butler shall be allowed eight (8) hours of pay at the trackman's straight time rate because of the violation referred to in Part (1) hereof."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Prior to this dispute, Claimant held seniority as a trackman and was regularly assigned to a trackman position on Section Force 41 at Cleburne, Texas.




Form 1 Award No. 28027
Page 2 Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323
In 1986, the Washington's Birthday holiday was celebrated on Monday,
February 17. Claimant did not receive holiday pay.





NON-OPERATING NATIONAL

HOLIDAY PROVISIONS




Section 3 provides:


Form 1 Page 3

Award No. 28027
Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323

Except as provided in the following paragraph, all others for whom holiday pay is provided in Section 1 hereof shall qualify for such holiday pay if on the day preceding and the day following the holiday they satisfy one or the other of the following conditions:








For purposes of Section 1, other than regularly assigned employees who are relieving regularly assigned employes on the same assignment on both the work day preceding and the work day following the holiday will have the workweek of the incumbent of the assigned position and will be subject to the same qualifying requirements respecting service and availability on the work days preceding and following the holiday as apply to the employee whom he is relieving. Compensation paid under sick-leave rules or practices will not be considered as compensation for purposes of this rule."

The Organization contends Carrier arbitrarily placed Claimant on medical leave and he then became an "other than regularly assigned employee" whose eligibility for holiday pay is governed by Section 1(c) of Appendix 2.

Further, the Organization contends that even if, arguendo, Claimant was a regularly assigned employee he was "available" within the meaning of the Note to Section 3 of Appendix 2.

Carrier argues Claimant was and remained a regularly assigned Trackman and Section 3 of Appendix Form 1 Award No. 28027
Page 4 Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323

In support of its position the Organization relies upon Third Division Award 14625 in which regu prior to a holiday and who therefore did not work on the first work day after the holiday were treated as other than regularly assigned employees. We believe the distinction betw furlough is significant. In Third Division Award 23831, a regularly assigned employee who did not work on his first scheduled day after a holiday due to prearranged surgery was held not to be qualified for holiday pay. That principle is applicable here. employee was not changed by his being placed on leave of absence for medical reasons and we note no evidence was introduced to suggest Carrier acted arbitrarily in placing Claim the Note to Section 3 of Appendix 2.



        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


Attest: ~~,c'1
Nancy J. r - Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 10th day of August 1989.