Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28027
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee John E. Cloney when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it failed and refused to
allow Trackman 0. K. Butler holiday pay for Washington's Birthday (February
17, 1986) (System File 90-16-862/11-1080-20-10).
(2) Claimant 0. K. Butler shall be allowed eight (8) hours of pay at
the trackman's straight time rate because of the violation referred to in Part
(1) hereof."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Prior to this dispute, Claimant held seniority as a trackman and was
regularly assigned to a trackman position on Section Force 41 at Cleburne,
Texas.
On January 31, 1986, Claimant was sent a letter informing him that:
"Following review of recent medical information,
it has been concluded that you will be held out
of service and placed on leave of absence
February 15, 1986, at the end of the 15-day
vacation you started January 27, and referred to
Mr. Ron Geiser for rehabilitative procedures."
Form 1 Award No. 28027
Page 2 Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323
In 1986, the Washington's Birthday holiday was celebrated on Monday,
February 17. Claimant did not receive holiday pay.
Appendix 2, Section 1 of the Agreement provides in pertinent parts:
"APPENDIX N0. 2
NON-OPERATING NATIONAL
HOLIDAY PROVISIONS
(c) Subject to the applicable qualifying
requirements in Section 3 hereof, other than
regularly assigned employees shall be eligible
for the paid holidays or pay in lieu thereof
provided for in paragraph (b) above, provided
(1) compensation for 'service paid him by the
carrier is credited to 11 or more of the 30
calendar days immediately preceding the holiday
and (2) he had a seniority date for at least 60
calendar days of continuous active service preceding the holiday beginning with the first day
of compensated service, provided employment was
not terminated prior to the holiday by resignation, for cause, retirement, death, non-compliance wit
Section 3 provides:
"Section 3. A regularly assigned employee
shall qualify for the holiday pay provided in
Section 1 hereof if compensation paid him by the
carrier is credited to the workdays immediately
preceding and following such holiday or if the
employee is not assigned to work but is available for service on such days. If the holiday
falls on the last day of a regularly assigned
employee's workweek, the first workday following
his rest days shall be considered the workday
immediately following. If the holiday falls on
the first workday of his workweek, the last
workday of the preceding workweek shall be
considered the workday immediately preceding the
holiday.
Form 1
Page 3
Award No. 28027
Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323
Except as provided in the following paragraph, all others for whom holiday pay is
provided in Section 1 hereof shall qualify for
such holiday pay if on the day preceding and the
day following the holiday they satisfy one or
the other of the following conditions:
(i) Compensation for service paid by the
carrier is credited; or
(11) Such employee is available for
service.
NOTE: 'Available' as used in subsection
(ii) above is interpreted by the
parties to mean that an employe is
available unless he lays off of his
own accord or does not respond to a
call, pursuant to the rules of the
applicable agreement, for service.
For purposes of Section 1, other than
regularly assigned employees who are relieving
regularly assigned employes on the same assignment on both the work day preceding and the work
day following the holiday will have the workweek
of the incumbent of the assigned position and
will be subject to the same qualifying requirements respecting service and availability on the
work days preceding and following the holiday
as apply to the employee whom he is relieving.
Compensation paid under sick-leave rules or
practices will not be considered as compensation
for purposes of this rule."
The Organization contends Carrier arbitrarily placed Claimant on
medical leave and he then became an "other than regularly assigned employee"
whose eligibility for holiday pay is governed by Section 1(c) of Appendix 2.
Further, the Organization contends that even if, arguendo, Claimant
was a regularly assigned employee he was "available" within the meaning of the
Note to Section 3 of Appendix 2.
Carrier argues Claimant was and remained a regularly assigned Trackman and Section 3 of Appendix
Form 1 Award No. 28027
Page 4 Docket No. MW-27825
89-3-87-3-323
In support of its position the Organization relies upon Third Division Award 14625 in which regu
prior to a holiday and who therefore did not work on the first work day after
the holiday were treated as other than regularly assigned employees. We believe the distinction betw
furlough is significant. In Third Division Award 23831, a regularly assigned
employee who did not work on his first scheduled day after a holiday due to
prearranged surgery was held not to be qualified for holiday pay. That principle is applicable here.
employee was not changed by his being placed on leave of absence for medical
reasons and we note no evidence was introduced to suggest Carrier acted arbitrarily in placing Claim
the Note to Section 3 of Appendix 2.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: ~~,c'1
Nancy J. r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 10th day of August 1989.