Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28225
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MS-28490
89-3-88-3-284
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Cheryele Rolfe
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
1) Carrier violated Article XI, Section 1 of a December 11, 1981
National Agreement which was made part of the May 27, 1982 Agreement between
the Carrier and the Union when it failed to compensate me at the full Reservation Sales Agent rate o
22, 1986 and, instead, compensated me at a reduced rate for my first twentyfour months of servic
2) Carrier shall now be required to compensate to me an amount of
money equal to the difference between what I should have been paid during the
twenty-four (24) month period and what I would have been paid had I been paid
at the full rate."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant entered the Carrier's service on May 21, 1979. She held the
classification of Chief, On-Board Service, a position represented by the American Railway and Airway
22, 1986), the Claimant was paid under the provisions of Article XI, Section 1
(a) and (b), providing for pay of less than applicable rate for a two-year
period.
I
Form 1 Award No. 28225
Page 2 Docket No. MS-28490
89-3-88-3-284
A Claim was filed on the Claimant's behalf on July 16, 1987, contesting the propriety of the pay
The Carrier argues, as a procedural matter, that the Claim is untimely under Rule 25 (a), which
"(a) All claims or grievances other than those involving Discipline (Rule 24) must be presented
supervisor within sixty (60) days from the date of the
occurrence on which the claim or grievance is based."
The Board finds that the Claim was filed well in excess of the 60-day
period specified in Article 25 (a); that is, more than 60 days after the
completion of the initial two-year period of service as a Reservation Sales
Agent. The Board is thus without authority to review the matter on its merits.
A W A R D
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy Jy/vier - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of December 1989.
- -