Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28264
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-27988
90-3-87-3-515
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Norfolk and Western Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-10188) that:
1. Carrier violated the agreement between the parties particularly
but not limited to the October 27, 1977 Memorandum Agreement and the Master
Agreement dated April 1, 1973, as amended, when on the dates of August 5,
September 6, 8, and 9, 1983 Carrier diverted the incumbent of the Clerk's
position reporting at 9:00 A.M. to the Agent's position reporting at 7:00
A.M., at Princeton, West Virginia.
2. As a consequence of said violations Carrier shall be required to
compensate senior qualified employe eight (8) hours pay at the applicable rate
each date who stood to be called for the vacant Clerk's position 9:00 A.M.
account of the diversion."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On August 5, and September 6, 8, and 9, 1983, Clerk Scaadland was
diverted from his regular assignment of Clerk (reporting at 9:00 A.M.,
Princeton, West Virginia) to position of Agent (reporting at 7:00 A.M.).
Clerk Scandland's position was not filled. The Organization filed a Claim contending that Carrier vi
employee and then failing to fill the diverted employee's position. The Organization cites Rule 42,
Rule reads in pertinent part as follows:
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 28264
Docket No. CL-27988
90-3-87-3-515
"MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT
DATED OCTOBER 26, 1977
Section 1. Based on decisions rendered in
N.R.A.B. Third Division Award 17550 and Awards
6 and 7 of Public Law Board No. 1790, it is
mutually agreed that Rule 42 of the April 1,
1973 Master Agreement between the parties is
interpreted to provide that temporary vacancies
of thirty calendar days or less and any resultant vacancies will be filled when:
(c) The Carrier elects to fill a
vacancy by use of an employee
under provisions of Rule 14 or
by diversion of an employee
from his regular position."
Carrier denied the Claim on the property, but agreed during a conference on September 20, 1984,
similar Claim listed before the Board was decided. Third Division Award 26316
was issued on May 13, 1987. This Board upheld the Organization's Claim on the
facts, but withheld payment of any wages, since no Claimant was identified.
This Board has reviewed Third Division Award 26316 and the record in
this case. We find the facts to be all but identical, except that the Organization did identify duri
In keeping with the Board's desire to bring consistency and predictability to railroad labor rel
sustain the Claim. We will, however, only award payment to Claimant M. R.
Shelton on a straight-time basis.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
Attest:
Nancy ver - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1990.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
CARRIER MEMBERS' DISSENT
TO
AWARD 28264, DOCKET CL-27988
(Referee Rodney Dennis)
The majority erred in sustaining the claim for eight hours pay.
The claim involved a request for eight hours pay on behalf of the "oldest senior
qualified employee" when Carrier failed to fill the clerk to agent's position at
Princeton, West Virginia, after the incumbent of said assignment was diverted (".moved
up") to the agent's position.
In Award 26316 involving the same parties, same rules, and same facts, claim was
presented on behalf of the "senior qualified employee" because the Carrier diverted an
employee from his assignment of clerk reporting at 7:00 a.m. to the position of agent
reporting at 10:00 a.m. and did not fill the resultant vacancy. In that Award, the
Board held that there was a rule violation, but withheld money damages given the
absence of a named claimant.
In the instant case, the grievance was filed on September 21, 1983 for the "oldest
senior qualified employee." Throughout the handling on the property, the name of the
individual on whose behalf a claim was made was not made known to Carrier. At no time
did the Organization challenge Carrier's statement that there was no qualified employee
on the seniority roster available to fill the resultant vacancy. During conference on
September 2', 1984, the parties agreed to close the record in this dispute, hold the
claim in abeyance and review it on disposition of the case covered by Award 26316.
It was only after Award 26316 was rendered, some three years and nine months
following final handling of the instant claim on the property, that the Organization
offered for the first time, evidence to challenge Carrier's position there was no
qualified available employee to fill the resultant vacancy.
Carrier Members' Dissent to
Award 28264
Page 2
The Carrier pointed cut that the Organization's argument that Clerk M. R. Shelton
was available to fi11 the resultant vacancy came too late, that the record was closed
in 1984, and further arguments could not be developed. Most importantly, the Carrier
furnished the Organization a handwritten statement from the alleged claimant that he
was not qualified to work the clerk to agent position. Nevertheless, the Majority has
held that:
"...the Organization did identify during discussions on the property the most
senior qualified available Clerk to fill Scandland's open position." For the
obvious reason that this Award is based on an erroneous understanding of the
facts, we dissent.