Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28283
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28463
90-3-88-3-265
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood


1. Carrier, acting arbitrarily, violated Rule 19 and other related rules of the Agreement when, on January 1, 1987, it failed to credit Claimant with any sick leave allowance to be utilized by him during calendar year 1987.

2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Claimant an amount equal to seven and one-half (7 1/2) days of sick leave allowance or failing to do that, credit him with the number of days of sick leave allowance consistent with rate progression provisions applicable to Claimant.



FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



This dispute focuses on the question of whether the Claimant is entitled to sick leave. The Claimant contends that he was improperly denied sick leave allowance for calendar year 1987. The Board has carefully reviewed the evidence properly before us and has considered the Organization's arguments. However, these cont language of Rule 19(a), applicable here.
Form 1 Award No. 28283
Page 2 Docket No. CL-28463
90-3-88-3-265
The record shows that the Claimant was compensated for 100 days of
service during 1986. There is no dispute that the 100 days of work in 1986
was an insufficient amount of time to qualify the Claimant for vacation days
in 1987. Rule 19(a) of the Agreement, in pertinent part, states:



Accordingly, because the Claimant was not entitled to a paid vacation in 1987, he also did not qualify for sick leave in 1987.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest: '.
        Nancy J. v -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1990.