Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28403
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-28460
90-3-88-3-236
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Duluth, Winnipeg S Pacific Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The claim* as presented by Acting General Chairman J. Ritacco to
Assistant Engineer/Roadmaster R. Soger on May 12, 1987 shall be allowed as
presented because said claim was not disallowed by Labor Relations 6 Personnel
Officer R. A. Olson (appealed to him on July 7, 1987) in accordance with Rule
21 (System File 11231/G.106-S(71/87)(S)].
*The letter of claim will be reproduced within our
initial submission."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
nd all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The Claimant herein contends that he should have been selected to
perform work as a Flagman in preference to a junior employee, who was assigned
the work.
In the claims handling procedure, the Claim was appealed to the Labor
Relations and Personnel Officer in a letter dated July 7, 1987. This Carrier
official responded by denying the Claim in a letter dated September 10, 1987.
The Organization alleges that the response was untimely and that the
Claim should be granted on this basis. Rule 21, Claims and Grievances, reads
in pertinent part as follows:
Form 1 Award No. 28403
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28460
90-3-88-3-236
"(a) All claims or grievances must be presented in
writing by or on behalf of the employee involved, to
the Officer of the Carrier authorized to receive same,
within sixty (60) days from the date of the occurrence
on which the claim or grievance is based. Should any
such claim or grievance be disallowed, the Carrier shall,
within sixty (60) days from the date same is filed,
notify whoever filed the claim or grievance (the employee
or his representative) in writing of the reasons for such
disallowance. If not so notified, the claim or grievance
shall be allowed as presented, but this shall not be con
sidered as a precedent of [sic.] waiver of the conten
tions of the Carrier as to other similar claims or griev
ances."
From the record on the property, the Board must conclude that the
Carrier failed to disallow the Claim within 60 days from the date it was
"filed". Under such circumstances, Rule 21 provides that the Claim must be
"allowed as presented". The remedy shall provide for the applicable
difference in pay for the Claimant.
In a matter involving the same parties, Third Division Award 25091,
the importance of strict adherence to Rule 21 provisions is stressed.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy J er - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of May 1990.