Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28492
 THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28609
 90-3-89-3-64
 The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
 addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.
 (Transportation Communications International Union
 PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
 (Elgin, Joliet 6 Eastern Railway Company

 STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood

1. Carrier violated the effective agreement when on October 11, 12, 16, 17, 30, 31 and November 2, 1987, it required and/or permitted employes in Seniority District No. 3 to absorb the duties of positions exclusively assigned to a different location and seniority district.

 2. Carrier shall now compensate the senior off-duty Input/Output Technician (IOT) eight (8) hours' pay at the time and one-half rate of an IOT position for each of the above dates."

 FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

 The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

 This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.

 Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.

 The Board notes that the Organization's Submission evidence was not presented on the property. Accordingly, pursuant to a long line of decisions by the Board, this new material and the arguments related to it will not be considered by the Board.

 The Claim before the Board essentially asserts that the Carrier transferred work covered by the Agreement from one location of the Carrier to another location.
 Form I Award No. 28492

 Page 2 Docket No. CL-28609
 90-3-89-3-64

properly before us. As the moving party in this matter, which is essentially a scope rule case, the Organization has the burden of proving all the vital elements. At a minimum, it must present relevant facts which normally would include the identity of the persons involved, the work claimed, and when and where it was performed. Because we do not find these facts fundamental to meeting a burden of proof requirement, the Claim is dismissed.




                            By Order of Third Division


Attest
        Nancy J.5l~er - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of August 1990.