Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28524
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-27716
90-3-87-3-175
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Irwin M. Lieberman when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (Seaboard System Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when, beginning November 19, 1985, a
pile driver operator from the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company was
used to operate a pile driver on the Atlanta Division at Rockmart, Georgia
[System File MachOp-86-8/12-1(86-178) I].
(2) Because of the aforesaid violation, each employe holding a
position in the Maintenance of Way General Subdepartment, Group A, Machine
Operator, on the Rocky Mount, Raleigh, Florence, Savannah, Atlanta, Waycross,
Jacksonville and Tampa Divisions during the claim period shall be allowed pay,
at their respective rates, for an equal proportionate share of the man-hours
expended by Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company pile driver operator in
performing the work referred to in Part (1) hereof."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Beginning on November 18, 1985, Carrier assigned an employee holding
seniority on the former L 5 N Railroad to operate a crane (termed a pile
driver by the Organization) to assist a Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Bridge
Gang to remove a bridge on the Atlanta Division of the former Seaboard Coast
Line. The Claim herein was filed on January 27, 1986, some seventy days
following the initial assignment. The work continued until January 27, 1986.
Form 1 Award No. 28524
Page 2 Docket No. MW-27716
90-3-87-3-175
The Organization insists that the employee Carrier used had no
seniority on this Carrier whatever and hence no right to any work on the
property in question. On the other hand, it is argued that there were
available Machine Operators with the requisite skills and seniority to do the
work. The Claimants all had seniority as Group A Machine Operators on the
former SCL, and pile drivers as well as cranes are considered Group A-Roadway
Machines, under Rule 5 of the Agreement. The Organization also maintains that
the Claimants are readily identifiable from Carrier's payroll records. It is
also argued by the Organization that there was a loss of work opportunity
involved in this matter.
Carrier argues first that the Claim was not timely filed since it was
presented some seventy days following the initial assignment of an LSN employee on the pile driver.
failed to identify the employee allegedly damaged. Carrier avers further that
the particular piece of equipment was a converted steam-powered machine requiring a qualified operat
From the entire record of this matter, it seems apparent that this is
indeed a continuing Claim and was properly filed under Rule 40. However,
under that Rule, it certainly has no retroactivity beyond sixty days. It
should be noted that Carrier properly raised the timeliness issue during the
handling on the property. The Board finds that Carrier improperly used an
employee with no seniority on the property for the work in question (this
regardless of the good motivation of keeping the particular gang working).
There has been no showing that there were no employees from the SCL seniority
list who could have been made available for the work. Further, there should
be no problem in identifying the Claimants herein (see Third Division Award
22274). With respect to Carrier's position on the nature of a possible remedy, it seems clear that i
opportunity and under well-established precedents are entitled to full compensation, rather than the
example, Third Division Awards 14004, 17051 among many others). In sum, therefore, the Claim must be
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Nancy ever - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of August 1990.