Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28535
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28917
90-3-89-3-316
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Barry E. Simon when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood


(CARRIER'S FILE N0. TCU-D-2973/TCU FILE N0. 393-E8-559-D)

1. Carrier acted in an arbitrary, capricious and unjust manner when it dismissed from service Ticket Clerk/Operator, Ms. Betty Barnes as a result of an Investigation conducted on October 18, 1988.

2. Carrier shall now be required to reinstate Claimant to service with seniority rights unimpaired, compensate her for all time lost and cleanse from her work record all reference to this matter.

3. Carrier shall compensate Claimant the cost of Medical, Surgical and Dental premiums to the extent that such coverage would be payable by the carrier under existing insurance provisions."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Carrier received a complaint about Claimant from a passenger who wanted to ship 14 packages from Jacksonville, Florida, where Claimant was employed as Relief Ticket Clerk, Operator/Baggageman. According to this complaint, the passenger, an Claimant at approximately 6:00 P.M. She was told by Claimant that the baggage department was closed until 11:00 P.M. and that she should return after that time. The woman, who had hired someone to handle the packages for her, then made arrangements to return later that night. Upon her return at approximately
Form 1 Award No. 28535
Page 2 Docket No. CL-28917
90-3-89-3-316

10:30 P.M., the woman learned that the baggage department is open 24 hours a day. When she questioned Claimant about this, Claimant became angry and began to curse and yell at another baggageman. She then began to throw the passenger's packages at the oth
Upon receipt of this complaint, Claimant was directed to attend a disciplinary Hearing, at which a letter describing these events from the passenger was placed into e the passenger's statements that Claimant threw packages and swore at the other baggageman. Claimant acknowledged that she asked the passenger to return later in the day. Claimant explained that she had previously suffered an injury and was told not to denied that she cursed or tossed packages at the other employee.

Following the Hearing, Claimant was dismissed from service. Based upon our review of the record, we find that there was substantial evidence to support the Carrier's conclusion that Claimant was guilty of misconduct. Claimant's testimony was contradicted by employees who had no interest in the outcome of her Hearing. Claimant testified that the packages were too heavy for her to throw, although they averaged only 25 pounds. Because some of the boxes were near the 50 pound weight limit, others must have been substantially less than 25 pounds. Claimant's conduct in this case, as well as her previous discipline, supports the action taken by the Carrier. In reaching this conclusion, we have not consi discipline because counseling is not discipline.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
      Nancy J. er - Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of August 1990.