Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28549
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28710
90-3-89-3-95
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Irwin M. Lieberman when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Organization
(GL-10334) that:
(a) Carrier violated the intent and provisions of the current
Clerks' Agreement at Barstow, California, by improperly removing P. E. Mahoney
from service as a result of formal investigation held January 26, 1988; and
(b) Carrier shall now reinstate P. E. Mahoney to service with all
rights unimpaired; and
(c) Carrier shall also pay P. E. Mahoney the daily rate of his last
assigned position for each work day (40 hours per week) from the date of dismissal forward, until he
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant, with a seniority date of November 3, 1959, was on a scheduled vacation from August 31
to which he was to displace. While working on the new position, on September
4, 1987, Claimant allegedly sustained a back injury while performing filing
work. He was off for the long Labor Day weekend, and on the following Tuesday, September 9, 1987, at
Form 1 Award No. 28549
Page 2 Docket No. CL-28710
90-3-89-3-95
and asked to see a doctor. He filed the required injury report on September
9, 1987, and was taken to get medical help by Carrier officials. On the same
day he was cited with alleged violation of Carrier rules and was instructed to
report for an Investigation. He was charged with " ....failure to give his
immediate supervisor verbal notice of his alleged injury and withholding information on date of alle
...."
Following the Investigation held on January 26, 1988, Claimant was found
guilty of the charges and dismissed from service.
The Organization asserts that Claimant was not initially aware of the
severity of his injury and thus did not report it until the pain indicated
that he had a problem. Further it is argued that the penalty of dismissal was
arbitrary and capricious and obviously too severe for the particular infrac=
tion, even if he were guilty.
Carrier insists that Claimant was guilty of the charges and that the
discipline was warranted. First, Carrier notes that there is serious question
as to whether there was indeed any injury sustained. Further, based on the
information adduced at the Investigation, there is no explanation of the
reasons for the delay in reporting the alleged injury for a period of five
days; similarly with respect to the injury report form. Carrier also indicated that it had offered t
offer had been declined.
The Board must note that there are good and sufficient reasons for
Carrier rules with respect to prompt reporting of injuries. However, there
are certain types of accidents in which the extent of the injury is not
initially apparent. In this instance the alleged problem was not readily
apparent at the time of the incident. However, a long service employee such
as Claimant should have known the imperative of complying with Carrier's rules
and there is no ready explanation for the five day hiatus. Therefore, Carrier
was correct in determining that there had been a rule violation, but the extent of the discipline ac
For that reason, Claimant shall be reinstated with seniority intact, and all
other rights unimpaired (provided that he is medically cleared to work) but
will not be reimbursed for the time out of service.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
Form 1 Award No. 28549
Page 3 Docket No. CL-28710
90-3-89-3-95
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
~zg
Nancy J. D v - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1990.