Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28556
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. SG-28220
90-3-88-3-3
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert W. McAllister when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Long Island Rail Road (LI)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Long
Island Rail Road (LI):
Claim on behalf of Local Lodge No. 56's Grievance Committee of the
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen that the Carrier violated the current
Signalmen's Agreement, as amended, particularly Rule 19 (b), when on Bulletin
No. 19-86, dated August 13, 1986, for positions Nos. 163 and 164, it used an
asterisk and an addendum which are in violation of the bulletining rules."
Carrier and G. C. File SG-14-86.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
On August 13, 1986, the Carrier posted Bulletin No. 19-86, which advertised for bid several diff
information normally contained in a bulletin, the Carrier added "Job Task
Description and Qualifications" for the two Assistant Foreman positions. The
Carrier then set forth the following:
"1. Qualifications include but are not limited to the
following:
a. Qualified to supervise the test, alignment,
repair and replacement of: Dispatcher
Systems A, B, C, & D, public address system
at Jamaica and at all passenger stations, all
Form I Award
No.
28556
Page 2 Docket
No.
SG-28220
90-3-88-3-3
data communications circuits and modems, all
fire and security alarm circuits, all tape
recorders, electrowriters, test board equip
ment and all telephone equipment.
b. Qualified to operate personal computer for
inventory control, daily log, record keeping,
cable records, etc., after attending companysupplied training program. If required, company-supplied
attaining Assistant Foreman position.
c. Qualified to supervise the operation of automatic and diagnostic test equipment pertaining to
circuits associated with the main dis'_-'t_bution
frame."
The Organization has protested the inclusion of the above language on
the bulletin, arguing that the Agreement specifies the format of such bulletins, which may not be va
rule. The Organization allows the additions to the bulletin are helpful and
may be necessary, and agrees that the Carrier has the right to demand qualifications for positions w
The Carrier states the addendum to the bulletin serves to differentiate between the Assistant Fo
opposed to the position in the Maintenance Section. The Carrier argues it has
the right to determine the qualifications for a given position and there are
benefits to stating those qualifications on the bulletin. It suggests that
listing the job content and requirements in advance would enable employees to
more realistically assess their own chances of successfully performing the job
before they bid on it.
The substance of the addendum is not at issue. Even if it were, the
record before this Board does not afford us a basis to conclude whether or not
the Carrier has imposed qualifications for the jobs which are beyond whatever
limits the Agreement might impose, if any. The sole issue is whether or not
the Carrier may add descriptive matter of this nature to the job bulletin.
While both parties seem to recognize there might be value including
such information, we are limited to interpreting the Agreement. Rule 19(b),
which governs the content of bulletins, does not merely list the elements to
be included in the bulletin. Instead, it contains what it calls a "facsimile"
which is, essentially, a form to be filled in with the appropriate information
about each position. This facsimile includes the format for the letterhead of
the bulletin. Of all the ways the Rule could have been written, the parties
not only chose to put the format in the Agreement, but they chose the word
"facsimile," which means an exact copy. The format was not offered as an example or guideline. We co
Form 1 Award No. 28556
Page 3 Docket No. SG-28220
90-3-88-3-3
dum information was not permitted by Rule 19(b). Because the Rule clearly
sets out the extent of the information to be provided in the bulletin, it is
not this Board's function to determine why the parties did not agree to permit
additional information. Our holding in this case is limited to the specific
Claim before the Board.
A W A R D
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
c
LW
'.9- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1990.