Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28557
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. CL-28243
90-3-88-3-123
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert W. McAllister when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
(GL-10253) that:
1. The Carrier violated the Rules Agreement, effective January 1,
1983, particularly Rule 12(c), the principles of seniority and others when the
Carrier run around senior qualified available employees R. 0. Johnson and
R.
A. Lahti when filling short vacancies on the Agent's position at Keenan,
Minnesota, on August 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 29, 30; September 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,
27; October 2 and 3, 1986, and filling the Agent's position at Proctor,
Minnesota, on September 11, 12, 26, 29, 30; October 1, 9, 10; November 14
thru November 26, and December 1, 1986, utilizing instead junior employee W.
M. Clark.
2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Claimant
R. 0.
Johnson and
R.
A. Lahti eight (8) hours pro rata rate at the respective Agency
rate (Keenan or Proctor) for each of the following claim dates:
R.
A. Lahti: August 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 29, 30;
Employee !11918 September 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 27,
29, 30; October 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10, 1986, and
continuing, per Rule 20(d), for each and every
day that a junior employee works.
R. 0. Johnson: November 14, 1986 thru November 26, 1986,
Employee 114235 December 1, 1986, and continuing, per Rule
20(d), for each and every day that a junior
employee works."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Form 1
Page 2
Award No. 28557
Docket No. CL-28243
90-3-88-3-123
On the dates listed in the Claim, temporary (short) vacancies existed
on certain Class 2 positions by reason of vacation, illness or personal leave.
The Carrier appointed Employee Clark to work those positions. It is undisputed Clark was junior to t
the Carrier's right to fill Class 2 positions without regard to seniority is
restricted to permanent positions since Rule 12(c) grants furloughed employees
the right to fill short vacancies on a seniority basis. The Carrier, however,
avers that Agreement Rules which permit the filling of Class 2 positions without regard to seniority
that in an identical dispute involving the same parties, Third Division Award
25526 held that Class 2 positions were specifically exempted from seniority
application and
"...
the general seniority reference of filling vacancies in
12(c) has no application."
The Organization disputes the findings of Award '"^< arguing that
four key words were not taken into consideration. Rule 1(f) states:
"The following positions may be filled without
regard to seniority rules, but will be advertised. (Emphasis added)
The Organization believes the underlined phrase restricts the Rule to
the filling of permanent vacancies only. This conclusion lacks logical support in that it requires a
in the filling of temporary vacancies than in the filling of permanent Class 2
positions. In addition, this Board has repeatedly expressed reluctance to set
aside prior Awards involving essentially the same facts, Agreement rules, and
parties unless a decision is found palpably erroneous. See Third Division
Awards 14019, 20714, and 22406. We do not so find in this.matter and will,
accordingly, deny the Claim.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
Attest:
el~IQLZ
~ 00010.r,~
ancy J. e r - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1990.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division