Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28564
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-28368
90-3-88-3-137
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee George S. Roukis when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned Proctor Roundhouse pipefitters instead of B&B Composite Mechanics T. J. Bijold, G. M. Sjoquist and G. W. Jones to remove, install and maintain air line fittings at Dock 6 of the Duluth Ore Docks on January 27 and February 2, 1987.

(2) Messrs. Bijold and Sjoquist shall be allowed eight (8) hours of pay and Mr. Jones shall be allowed two (2) hours of pay at the straight time composite rate because of the violation noted above."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



As Third Party in Interest, the Sheet Metal Workers Association was advised of the pendency of this dispute and filed a Submission with the Division.

The basic facts of this case are set forth as follows: On January 27 and February 21, 1987, respectively, two pipefitters performed work in connection with fabricating a line on Duluth Dock No. 6 and removed an old pressure reducing valve from between Tracks 1 and 3 on position that under the Classification of Work Rule (Rule 26) said work accrued to B 6 B forces and work was performed by the pipefitters. The applicable portion of Rule 26 is cited as follows:
Form 1 Award No. 28564
Page 2 . Docket No. MW-28368
90-3-88-3-137



Also, the Organization referenced Supplement No. 9 Jurisdiction of Work -Maintenance of Way - ORE Dock Employees as controlling: This Supplement reads:













In response, while Carrier concedes that B 6 B forces are entitled to perform work that involves the installation, maintenance and relocation of air lines, it asserts that the Agreement Rule does contain language that relates to the manufacture and transportation of the parts to the job site. It acknowledged that utilization by this Rule. Further, it contends that the monetary penalty requested by the Organization was excessive, since the amount of time expended by the pipefitters actually installing this point that remained at issue between the parties.
Form 1 Award No. 28564
Page 3 Docket No. MW-28368
90-3-88-3-137

In considering this case, there is no dispute regarding the improper utilization of pipefitters to perform Agreement protected work, namely the installation of a new air pressure reducing valve on Duluth Dock No. 6, the removal of an old air pressure reducing valve from between Tracks 1 and 3, and the reconnection of air lines to the air compressor on the dock. This work involved installation and thus was covered by the Classification of Work Rule and Supplement No. 9. Even the pipefitters utilized acknowledged that they performed installation work. Since the Organization in its letter of July 4, 1987, limited the Claim to encompassing only installation work and since there has been no evidence showing that the actual installation time was less than this amount, the Board must find for the organization. Claimants G. M. Sjoquist and T. J. Bijold shall be paid 7 1/2 hours at the composite rate and Claimant G. W. Jones shall be paid 2 hours at the same rate.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest: .
ancy J. r - Executive Secretary

        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1990.