Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28570
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-29019
90-3-89-3-443
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Barry E. Simon when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake and Ohio
Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The ten (10) working days of actual suspension imposed upon
Assistant Foreman D. A. Murphy for alleged failure to properly protect work
authorities on September 8, 1988 between DG Cabin and Limeville, Kentucky, was
harsh and unjust (System File C-D-4572/12(88-1007 COS).
(2) The Claimant shall have his record cleared of the charge leveled
against him, he shall be paid all wage loss suffered and have ten (10) days
credited toward his vacation qualifying time."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Before leaving work on September 7, 1988, Claimant, an Assistant
Foreman, received authority from the control station to perform track maintenance work the following
permitted to do so by the employee in charge, which was Claimant.
At 7:10 A.M. on September 8, 1988, while two trains were stopped and
attempting to contact the employee in charge, the Roadmaster became aware that
Claimant was not at work. Claimant was subsequently found at the lodging
facility, where he stated that he was too sick to go to work.
Form 1 Award No. 28570
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29019
90-3-89-3-443
Claimant subsequently received a ten day suspension for failure to
properly protect his work authority. At his Investigation, Claimant acknowledged that he had an oppo
work, but failed to do so. Based upon this testimony, we conclude that the
Carrier had just cause to issue the discipline.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third ^ivision
Attest:
Nancy J. a -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of September 1990.