Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28643
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. SG-28850
91-3-89-3-253
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Eckehard Muessig when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former GA/AWP/WofAL)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Georgia,
Atlanta West Point and the Western of Alabama
Railway Companys (sic) (GA-AWP-WofAL):
On behalf of the following GA-AWP-WofAL Signal Personnel who participated in the repair work on
"F. L. Bunn J. F. Williams
J. F. Mitchell T. E. Lally
K. E. Langford R. C. Shumpert
S. Hogan J. R. Hudson
R. H. Mayfield, Jr. W. H. Bray
S. H. Glover M. K. Kephart
C. T. Godwin J. A. Albright
F. S. Eddings, Jr. J. D. Holloman
J. L. Yancey
(a) Carrier violated the Signalmen's Agreement, particularly, the
Scope, when it permitted and/or instructed Signal personnel from another
railroad to perform Signal work on the Western of Alabama Railroad on January
9, 1988.
(b) Carrier now be required to compensate the above claimants for two
hours and four minutes each at their overtime,Tajes of pay (a total of 35 man
hours equal to the violation time)." G. C. File FL-102 Carrier file 15-1(8832).
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 28643
Page 2 Docket No. SG-28850
91-3-89-3-253
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The significant events leading to this Claim arose on January 9,
1988, due to damage to the Carrier's signal system caused by an ice storm.
The Carrier utilized five signal maintainers from the former L 6 N to perform
the work.
The Board has carefully reviewed the record and concludes that an
emergency situation existed to restore the signal system. It has been consistently held that the Car
situations, such as we find in this case.
A Ii A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J.
D
v -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of January 1991.
e