Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28676
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-28676
91-3-89-3-25
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company (formerly The
( Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when on October 21, 1987, it
assigned four (4) trackmen, one (1) tamper operator, one (1) backhoe operator
and one (1) truck driver who hold seniority under the Detroit, Toledo and
Ironton Agreement to service and repair the Diamond at Mile Post 37.33 at F.N.
Tower in Trenton, Michigan which is on territory covered by the Detroit,
Toledo and Shore Line Agreement (Carrier's File 8365-1-243).
(2) As a consequence of the aforesaid violation, Detroit, Toledo and
Shore Line Agreement Tamper Operator E. S. Burt, Truck Driver 0. Rose, Backhoe
Operator E. Merrell and Trackmen F. Watters, Jr., M. Callahan, W. England and
F. Hammac shall each be allowed eight (8) hours of pay at their respective
straight time rates."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
On October 21, 1987, the Carrier used four Trackmen, one Tamper
Operator, one Backhoe Operator and one Truck Driver to surface and repair the
track diamond at :Nile Post 37.33 at F. N. Tower, Trenton, Michigan. These
employees held seniority under the Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Agreement. The
Organization convincingly asserts this track diamond has been "customarily and
historically" maintained by Detroit and Toledo Short Line employees under
their separate Agreement. The work involved is such as is normally performed
by employees in the Claimants' classification.
Form 1 Award No. 28676
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28676
91-3-89-3-25
The Board has thoroughly reviewed the record in this case and finds
that the Organization has met its burden of proof, whereas Carrier mounted
what is an affirmative defense but failed to support that defense with any
records whatsoever. Furthermore, if the Joint Facility Agreement would have
supported Carrier, a copy thereof was not furnished until Carrier's Submission
which is entirely too late to be considered by this Board.
The Board does not find that this Claim for work performed on one day
is impaired because several Claimants were otherwise employed that day and
others were in furlough status.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J. De r Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of February 1991.