Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 28713
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. TD-29038
91-3-89-3-442
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
(American Train Dispatchers Association PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Carrier violated Article VI of the National Agreement dated May 30, 1979, when on the second period of January 1988 pay period Carrier recovered the sum of $20.00 which had been paid to Mr. Heflin on the first period of December 1987 pay period.
The Attorney General fpr the .State of Alabama, has determined that a TenDollars per day payment Alabama, 1979, is an expense allowance and not a salary. Therefore, should not be subtracted by an employer from the employee's normal salary under section 12-16-8, code of Alabama, 1975.
Kindly acknowledge receipt of this appeal advising if claimant Heflin will be reimbursed the $20.00 recovppr--d from his pay check on the second period of January 1988."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



Claimant served as a juror in Walker County, Alabama Circuit Court. As a result of this jury duty, he was required to miss two days of work. Carrier paid Claimant his basic day's pay for the two days, as is required by article VI, Jury Duty, of the National Agreement. This Article reads as follows:
Form 1 Award No. 28713
Page 2 Docket No. TD-29038
91-3-89-3-442


















Claimant furnished Carrier with the statement from the courts confirming his assignment as a jur for serving as a juror. Carrier deducted $20 dollars ($10 dollars for each day he was paid) from his pay.

A Claim was filed protesting the deduction. It was denied by Carrier and has been submitted to this Board for resolution.

At issue in this instance is whether the $10 paid each day to a juror is in the nature of a fee that can be deducted from an employee's pay or whether it is an allowance This Board has reviewed the record and has concluded that the reasoning relied on in Second Division Award 9488, with this Referee in attendance, applies equally as well to the instant case. The Claim was denied in that decision.

We can find no evidence in this record to support the Organization's position that the $10 per day in question is paid to a juror specifically for food, lodging, or transportation, the sole basis mandated by Article VI of the National Agreement for not returning money to the Carrier.






                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        Id*Trf-'y J. D -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of 'larch 1991.