Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 29023
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-28880
91-3-89-3-287
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (Former Missouri Pacific
Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned outside
forces to construct a new diesel fuel line in the vicinity of Pike Avenue Yard
in North Little Rock, Arkansas beginning September 8, 1986 (Carrier's File
870057 MPR).
(2) The Carrier also violated Article IV of the May 17, 1968 National Agreement when it failed t
transaction.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1)
and/or (2) above, furloughed Water Service Assistant Foreman W. R. Bradford
shall be allowed pay at the assistant foreman's rate for one hundred twenty
(120) hours at the straight time rate and four and one-half (4.5) hours at the
time and one-half rate."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
During September 1986, the Carrier engaged an outside contractor to
construct a new diesel fuel line at North Little Rock, Arkansas. The Organization's Claim here close
reviewed in Third Division Award 29021, and that Award is incorporated herein
by reference.
The one difference is that the Carrier did provide notice to the
Organization concerning the project. However, such notice was given under
date of September 16, 1986, while the work in question had begun earlier on
Form 1 Award No. 29023
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28880
91-3-89-3-287
September 8, 1986. This clearly does not meet the requirement of Article
IV--Contracting Out of the Agreement of May 17, 1968, which calls for notice
"in advance of the date of the contracting transaction as is practicable and
in any event not less than 15 days prior thereof."
Because of the tardy (and therefore ineffectual) notice and based
on the Board's reasoning in Third Division Award 29021, the Claim must be
supported.
A WAR D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
NTJ.,Xv
00 -Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 28th day of October 1991.