Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 29024
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-28903
91-3-89-3-308
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned outside forces (ISTOCK Corporation) to perform culvert cleaning work between 11th and 15th Streets in Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania on October 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13, 1987 (System Docket CR-3663).

(2) The Agreement was further violated when the Carrier failed to timely and properly notify the General Chairman and confer with him concerning its intention to contract said work as contractually stipulated in the second and third paragraphs of the Scope Rule.

(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1) and/or (2) above, furloughed Pittsburgh Division employes M. K. Ryan, J. M. Federinko, C. E. Swheiger, Jr. and T. J. Surlas shall each be allowed fiftysix (56) hours of pay at
FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



By letter dated September 2, 1987, the Carrier notified the General Chairman as follows:




Form 1 Award No. 29024
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28903
91-3-89-3-308
qualified operators. Past attempts to rent such equipment have
been unsuccessful."
This was in compliance with that portion of the Scope Rule which

reads as follows:





The record shows =hat the Senior Director-Labor Relations discussed the matter with the General Chairman in a telephone conversation on September 15, 1987. At that time, it was mutually agreed to meet on October 7, which meeting was then mutually postponed until October 14, 1987.

Work on the project by the outside contractor commenced on October 5, 1987.

The Board finds that the Carrier properly complied with the Scope Rule notice requirement. Delay in the requested meeting thereafter must be found to be the responsibility of the Organization, at least in substantial part.

As to the propriety of the contracting itself, the Board finds that the special equipment involved, the practical unavailability of rental equipment, and the lack of pr sufficient to warrant the Carrier's action in placing the work with an outside contractor.




Form 1 Award No. 29024
Page 3 Docket No. MW-28903
91-3-89-3-308
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division


Attest:
        ancy J. D -Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 28th day of October 1991.