Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 29053
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-28326
91-3-87-3-877
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Gil Vernon when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Commit=2e of the Erotherhood that:

(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier instructed Special Equipment Operator M. W. Carter to submit to a medical examination and then failed and refused to compensate Mr. Carter for the expense of the examination and the time expended obtaining.the examination (System File B-966/EMWC 86-117A).

(2) Mr. M. W. Carter shall be allowed three and one-half (3 1/2) hours of pay at his straight time rate and he shall be paid Seventy Dollars ($70.00) as reimbursement for the cost of the medical examination."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



The basic facts are not disputed. The Claimant, a Special Operator, was given a routine physical examination at Irving, Texas, by a Company Doctor in May 1986. At this time the Claimant's blood pressure was elevated to 168/106 and his weight was 242 pounds. Based on those findings, the Carrier's Chief Medical Officer requested that Claimant have his personal physician make a study of his physical condition, particularly as to high blood pressure control, giving Carrier's advise was transmitted to the Claimant in the form of a letter from the Superintendent. The letter s Form 1 Award No. 29053
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28326
91-3-87-3-877







The Claimant made an appointment for the examination which occurred during work hours. The claim seeks reimbursement for the cost of the exam and lost time.

At the outset, a procedural issue must be addressed. The Organization draws attention to the fac states that all submissions "must" be signed.

The Board acknowledges the rules and requirements of Circular No. 1. It is also acknowledged that the Carrier's submission does not comport with these requirements, and thus, it is not properly before the Board. However, this does not necessarily mean that the claim must be sustained as presented. The Organization's submission contains all the correspondence on the property. Accordingly, there is a record before us which sets forth the evidence and the Carrier's position. Our decision is based on that record.

On the merits, it is the conclusion of the Board that the claim cannot be sustained. Simply, there is no rule or contractual provision in this Agreement which prevents the Carrier from suggesting to the Claimant that he see his personal doctor or that requires them to pay for costs incurred in connection with the examination.






                          By Order of Third Division


Attest: ~~L'~/
Nancy J. -Vf - Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of November 1991.