Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD Award No. 29319
THIRD DIVISION Docket No. MW-29786
92-3-91-3-143
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James E. Mason when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville and
Nashville Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The five (5) days' suspension assessed against B&B, Crane
Operator G. E. Loomis for alleged '*** responsibility in connection with
personal injury that he sustained
...
on August 30, 1990
...
[and] being
"accident prone" ··..' was without just and sufficient cause, arbitrary,
capricious, on the basis of unproven charges and in violation of the Agreement
[System File 4(16)(90)/12(90-921) LNR].
(2) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part (1) hereof, the Claimant's record shal
and he shall be compensated for all wage loss suffered."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this
dispute are respectively carrier and employes within the meaning of the
Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The dispute in this case centers around a crane operator who, while
on duty and under pay, sustained a personal injury while performing an act
directly related to the operation of his crane. The Claimant was subsequently
charged with "responsibility in connection with personal injury sustained
....
You are also charged with being 'accident prone,' this being the seventh
personal injury incident that you have reported." Following a Hearing on
these charges, Claimant was assessed a five day actual suspension because "you
violated Rule 18 of the CSX Transportation Safety Handbook when you stepped on
the slippery deck surface." The notice of discipline also stated as follows:
Form 1 Award No. 29319
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29786
92-3-91-3-143
"The investigation also revealed that you had
reported four previous injuries relating to the
same crane as your injury of August 30, 1990."
The notice of discipline did NOT indicate any finding of guilt on the "accident prone" portion of th
of discipline is the only obtuse reference the Carrier made to that portion of
the charges.
Thereafter, the five day suspension was appealed through the normal
grievance procedures on the property, and, failing to reach a satisfactory
resolution thereon, the issue has come to this Board for final and binding
adjudication.
Each party has advanced numerous arguments and contentions relative
to their respective positions. They have cited numerous Awards in support of
their respective arguments. We have reviewed all of the citations and have
considered all of the arguments. We have, in addition, read and studied the
Hearing transcript as developed on the property.
We do not find it necessary to answer each of the several positions
advanced. Some of the arguments we fully endorse, such as Carrier's contention that employees may no
violate Safety Rules, and to be a source of danger and potential liability to
themselves, to other employees and to the Carrier.
However, having said that, we are unable, in this case from this
Hearing record to find that this employee acted negligently at the time and
place in question. The fact that an injury did occur, did not, ipso facto,
prove that overt negligence had occurred.
We need not, in this case, enter into a discussion relative to the
percentage probabilities/possibilities theories which have been advanced from
opposite directions by the respective parties. We do not, in this case, find
that the Claimant was found guilty of being "accident prone." He most certainly was not so notified
following the investigatory Hearing.
Carrier has not met the burden of proof in this record to support by
substantial evidence the imposition of discipline. Therefore, it is our conclusion that this
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
Form 1 Award No. 29319
Page 3 Docket No. MW-29786
92-3-91-3-143
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
'Nancy J., Be - Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of July 1992.