NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29626
Docket No. CL-29620
93-3-90-3-600
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edward L. Suntrup when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications
(International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
(Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Organization (GL-10527)
that:
(a) Carrier violated the provisions of the current
Clerks' Agreement at Kansas City, Kansas,
commencing July 17, 1989 when it permitted and/or
required an outside contractor, not subject to the
current Clerks' Agreement, to perform routine
schedule clerical work, and
(b) The work which was removed from the scope and
operation of the Agreement shall now be restored to
the employees covered thereby, and
*(c) The senior, available, regularly assigned employee
(or his successor in interest) in this class of
work shall now be compensated eight (8) hours' pay
at the time and one-half rate of his position, plus
all subsequent wage increases, each day, Monday
through Friday, commencing July 17, 1989 and
continuing until such violation ceases, in addition
to any other compensation he/she may have received
for these days.
*NOTE: To be determined by a joint check of the
Carrier's records."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 29626
Page 2 Docket No. CL-29620
93-3-90-3-600
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
A claim was filed by the Organization in September of 1989, at
the Carrier's Kansas City, Kansas, Station Department, alleging
that there was violation of the Agreement when the Carrier used
outside forces to do certain clerical work. After the claim was
denied by the Division Manager and properly appealed up to and
including the highest Carrier officer designated to hear such, this
case was docketed before the Board for final adjudication.
The Board has reviewed the extensive record before it in this
case and it must conclude, on merits, that the Organization has
failed to meet its burden of proof. The claim must, therefore, be
denied.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
ancy J. er- Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of April 1993.