NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29643
Docket No. MW-28015
93-3-87-3-569
The Third Division consisted of the regular member and in
addition Referee Edwin H. Benn when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation Inc. (former Seaboard
System Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood
that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
refused to compensate Bridge Tender B. P.
Piatt for the expenses he incurred performing relief bridge tender duties October
through December, 1984, January through
September, 1985, November and December, 1985
(System Files BPP-9/12-8(85-172) E; BPP-8534/12-36(85-267) E: BPP-85-60/12-36(85-312)
I; BPP-85-79/12-36(86-14) and BPP-86-4/1235(86-115) 1].
(2) The Claimant shall be reimbursed for expenses incurred on October 31, November 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 20, 28, 1984, in the amount
of $520.90 to be paid with interest in
accordance with the appropriate interest
rate in effect October, 1984 and the position of relief bridge tender shall be bulletined on the Tam
(3) The Claimant shall be reimbursed for expenses incurred on November and December, 1984,
and on January through September, 1985,
November and December, 1985, in the amount
of $6526.35 with interest accrued in accordance with the appreciated interest rate in
effect at the time of settlement."
FINDINGS:
Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 29643
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28015
93-3-87-3-569
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance thereon.
At the time this dispute arose, Claimant held seniority as a
Bridge Tender in the Maintenance of Way Subdepartment and was in a
furloughed status. On dates set forth in the claims and as
reflected by Claimant's expense reports, Claimant worked vacancies
as a Bridge Tender at various locations.
Specifically, the organization asserts in the five presented
claims that Claimant worked in a relief capacity on (a) October 31,
November 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 and 28, 1984; ;(b) November 25,
December 1, 7, 11, 25, 28, 1984, January 16, 21, 25, 28, February
1, 3, 7, March 4, 8, 16, 20, 23, 27, 1985: (c) April 15, 19, 29,
30, May 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, 19, 21, June 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10,
11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, July 1, 5, 8, 12, 1985; (d) July
15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, August 3, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, September
8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 1985: (e) November 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, December 6, 7,
8, 9, and 10, 1985.
These claims seek expenses incurred by Claimant from working
those vacancies.
The relevant Rules provide as follows:
" RULE 8
BULLETINING VACANCIES AND NEW POSITIONS
Section 1
(a) All vacancies and new positions, temporary
or permanent, that are expected to last more
than thirty (30) calendar days, will be
bulletined.
Section 2
Vacancies of seven (7) calendar days, or
less, may be filled using any eligible employee of the group and seniority district;
however, preference will first be given to
employees of the rank in which the vacancy
exists who may be out of work or working in
a lower rank account reduction of forces.
Form 1 Award No. 29643
Page 3 Docket No. MW-28015
93-3-87-3-569
Section 3
All temporary vacancies of more than seven
(7) calendar days and less than thirty-one
(31) calendar days' duration will be filled
as follows:
First, by using the senior employee of the
rank and group on the district who has
seniority in the rank in which the vacancy
occurs, who may be out of work or working in
a lower rank account reduction of forces.
Second, if no such employee is available,
the vacancy will be filled through the general promotion rules.
,r ,r
RULE 35
TRAVEL TIME
Section 1
The Carrier shall designate a headquarters
point for each regular position and for
employees not serving in regular positions
the Carrier shall designate a headquarters
points for each employee.
Section 4
Employees will not be allowed compensation
while traveling in the exercise of seniority
rights, between their homes and designated
assembling points, or for other personal
reasons.
RULE 36
TRAVEL EXPENSES
Section 1
Employees will be reimbursed for necessary
actual expenses incurred while away from
Form 1 Award No. 29643
Page 4 Docket No. MW-28015
93-3-87-3-569
their regular headquarters by direction of
the Management, whether off or on their
assigned territory. This Rule will not
apply to employees traveling in exercise of
their seniority rights nor to employees
customarily carrying lunches and not being
held away from their assigned territory an
unreasonable time beyond the evening meal
hours as provided in Rule 25."
The clear language of the Rules governs the specific facts in
these claims. Given the dates for which the individual claims were
made and the pattern of work reflected by the dates worked, we are
unable to find that the specific vacancies worked by Claimant were
"expected to last more than thirty (30) calendar days" under Rule
8, Section 1(a) requiring that the vacancies be bulletined. There
is insufficient basis for us to conclude as the organization argues
that the filling of the vacancies in this case must be looked at
in its entirety as one act or that the circumstances demonstrate
that the Carrier established a new position of Relief Bridge Tender
that had to be bulletined. Claimant was filling individual
vacancies through the exercise of his seniority. Therefore, the
requirements under Rule 35, Section 1 that "the Carrier shall
designate a headquarters point for each regular position and for
employees not serving in regular positions Carrier shall designate
a headquarters point for each employee" do not apply.
The record sufficiently demonstrates that Claimant worked the
vacancies in question under Rule 8, Sections 2 and 3 and did so by
exercising his seniority rights. Rule 35, Section 4 excludes
entitlement to compensation for "traveling in the exercise of
seniority rights, between their home and designated assembly
points." Rule 36 is similarly qualified by Section 1 of that Rule
excluding entitlement to expenses in situations where the employees
are "traveling in exercise of their seniority rights." Those
exceptions apply to these claims. The large number of dates worked
by Claimant was purely a function of Claimant exercising his
seniority rights to individual vacancies of less than 30 days.
Form 1 Award No. 29643
Page 5 Docket No. MW-28015
93-3-87-3-569
We therefore conclude that the Organization has not carried
its burden of demonstrating a Rule violation in these specific
cases. The claims must therefore be denied. See Third Division
Awards 26849, 26359, 26223.
Given the clarity of the Rules, the fact that the carrier made
some payments to Claimant in the past for similar claims does not
dictate a different result.
A W A R D
Claims denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest _
y J. r, Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of June, 1993