NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29657
Docket No. MW-29215
93-3-90-3-86
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr., when was rendered.
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
(
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (formerly The
(Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned
Boilermaker employes instead of Bridge and Building
employes to construct a platform for a modular building
in the Locomotive Shops at Huntington, West Virginia on
December 7, 8 and 9, 1988 [System File C-TC-4752/12(89
381) COS].
(2) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned
Boilermaker employes instead of Bridge and Building
employes to build a platform and connect stairs that lead
to the Wheel Shop office in the Locomotive Shops at
Huntington, West Virginia on January 12, 1989 [System
File C-TC-4759/12(89-376)].
(3) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it assigned
Boilermaker employes instead of Bridge and Building
employes to mount a handrail on the steps that lead to
the Wheel Shop office in the Locomotive Shops at
Huntington, West Virginia on January 17, 1989 [System
File C-TC-4757/12(89-375)].
(4) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (1) hereof, Bridge and Building employes R.
Adkins, M. Dial, J. Slone, J. Comer, H. Cobb, J.
Leonard and C. Thompson shall each be allowed an
equal proportionate share of the eighty-eight (88)
man-hours expended by Boilermaker employes in performing the work in question.
(5) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (2) hereof, Bridge and Building employes R.
Adkins, M. Dial, J. Slone, J. Comer, H. Cobb, J.
Leonard and C. Thompson shall each be allowed an equal
proportionate share of the twelve (12) man-hours
expended by Boilermaker employes in performing the
work in question.
Form 1 Award No. 29657
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29215
90-3-90-3-86
(6) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (3) hereof, Bridge and Building employes M.
Dial, J. Slone, J. Comer, H. Cobb, J. Leonard and C.
Thompson shall each be allowed an equal proportionate
share of the ten (10) man-hours expended by Boilermaker
employes in performing the work in question."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board upon the whole
record and all the evidence finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
In December 1988 and January 1989 the Carrier assigned
employees represented by the International Brotherhood of
Boilermakers to perform certain work at the Carriers Huntington
locomotive shops. This consisted of fabrication and installation
of a platform which a modular office structure was to be placed and
the installation of a stairway and handrail in connection
therewith. The Organization argues that this is work which should
properly be assigned to employees in the Bridges and Structures
Group.
The Boilermakers, as a third party at interest, were notified
of the dispute and made a written submission to the Board.
The organization relies on Rule 66, Classification, which
reads in pertinent part as follows:
"(c) In carrying out the principles of Paragraph (a),
bridge and structures forces will perform the work to
which they are entitled under the rules of this agreement
in connection with the construction . . . of. . . buildings and structures, except where such work i
by other employes under other agreements in accprdance
with the rules of such agreements or past practice in
the rules of such agreements or past practice in the
allocation of such work between the different crafts ...."
Form 1 Award No. 29657
Page 3 Docket No. MW-29215
93-3-90-3-86
The Board finds that the organization has not demonstrated
that the fabrication and installation of the nature here under
review must necessarily be performed by Maintenance of Way forces,
nor has it shown that work of this nature is customarily so
assigned. More particularly, the fabrication and installation here
does not appear to modify or substantially add to the basic
structure of the facility.
A closely similar situation was reviewed in Third Division
Award 22627, involving division of work between Maintenance of Way
and Boilermaker forces. That denial Award emphasized that, as here,
fabrication (by Boilermakers) occurred first and thereafter the
fabricated elements were put in place, thus not being the type of
"structural modification" to a building which might otherwise be
properly assigned to Bridge and Structures Group.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest
a~J. ever, Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of June, 1993.