NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29663
Docket No. MW-28494
93-3-88-3-304
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Gilbert H. Vernon when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance
(of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former
(Seaboard System Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the employes
assigned to Force 6504 were compensated at their
respective straight time rates instead of their time and
one-half overtime rates for the work they performed on
October 31, 1986 [System File 6504-86-56/12-27(87-191)
Ql.
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the employes
assigned to Force 6504 were not permitted to work their
scheduled assigned hours on November 3, 1986.
(3) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (1) above, the employes assigned to Force 6504 shall
each now be allowed the difference between what they
should have been paid at their time and one-half rates
and what they were paid at their straight time rates for
the work they performed on October 31, 1986.
(4) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (2) above, the employes assigned to Force 6504 shall
each be allowed ten (10) hours of pay at their straight
time rates because they were not allowed to work their
scheduled regularly assigned hours on November 3, 1986.11
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 29663
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28494
93-3-88-3-304
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The basic facts are as follows. The Claimants are members of
a floating extra gang housed in camp cars, assigned by bulletin to
work five eight-hour days, Monday through Friday. Pursuant to Rule
38 the gang opted to work Monday through Thursday 10 hours per day.
The relevant portion of Rule 38 reads:
"Section 1
Employees stationed in camp cars will be allowed,
when in the judgment of Management conditions permit, to
make weekend visits to their homes. If employees cannot
by using regular train service after completion of work
on the last day of the work week, arrive home within a
reasonable time and return to their camp on the first day
of the succeeding work week in time for regular service,
they will be allowed to make up time during the week in
order to do this, provided not more than two (2) hours
shall be made up on any one day and at no additional
expense to the Company.
Free transportation will be furnished over Company
lines where service is available, consistent with the
regulations of the Company, and any time lost on this
account will not be paid for. The total time worked each
day must be recorded in the time book on the day worked.
NOTE: In the application of Rule 38, Section 1,
System Forces, in making up time for the
purpose of accumulating rest time for
longer consecutive rest periods, may
elect, under the provisions of Section 3,
to work up to ten (10) hours on any
calendar days to the extent that the
total hours worked in each half month, at
no additional expense to the Company, are
the equivalent of the straight-time work
hours therein. When a holiday falls on a
regularly scheduled work day, a maximum
of thirty (30) minutes per day over the
regular 10-hour day may be worked up to a
total of two hours in any one pay half,
provided suitable working hours are
available."
Form 1 Award No. 29663
Page 3 Docket No. MW-28494
93-3-88-3-304
Upon the completion of work on Thursday, October 23, 1986, at
Callahan, Florida, the gang was instructed to report to work the
following Monday at Dublin, Georgia. The Carrier claims that in
transporting the camp car to Dublin it encountered operational
problems. Simply, it required more time than they had to make this
move, which required movement by through freight from Callahan to
Waycross, from Waycross to Savannah, and a move from Savannah to
Dublin via Vidalia. Accordingly, the gang was instructed to report
to work at Dublin, not on Monday; but on Tuesday. The gang worked
Tuesday through Friday, 10 hours each day and had Saturday and
Sunday off. They worked the following weeks Monday through
Thursday.
Within the time limits, the instant claim was filed claiming
straight time for not working on Monday and time and one-half for
working the following Friday. The claim is premised on the
following Rules:
"RULE 20
FORTY-HOUR WORK WEEK
NOTE: The expressions 'positions' and
`work' used in this Agreement refer to
service, duties, or operations necessary
be performed the specified number of days
per week, and not to the work week of
individual employees.
(a) GENERAL
The Carrier will establish, effective September 1,
1949, for all employees, subject to the exceptions
contained in the Agreement, a work week of forty (40)
hours, consisting of five (5) days of eight (8) hours
each, with two (2) consecutive days off in each seven
(7); the work weeks may be staggered in accordance with
the Carrier's operational requirements; so far as
practical the days off shall be Saturday and Sunday. The
foregoing work week rule is subject to the provisions of
this Agreement which follow:
r * x
(i) BEGINNING OF WORK WEEK
The term `work week' for regularly assigned
employees shall mean a week beginning on the first day on
Form 1 Award No. 29663
Page 4 Docket No. MW-28494
93-3-88-3-304
which the assignment is bulletined _to work, and for
unassigned employees shall mean a period of seven (7)
consecutive days starting with Monday."
"RULE 26
CALL RULE
Employees notified or called to perform work not
continuous with the regular work period will be allowed
a minimum of two (2) hours and forty (40) minutes at time
and one-half rate, and if held on duty in excess of two
(2) hours and forty (40) minutes, time and one-half will
be allowed on the minute basis."
"RULE 29
SERVICE ON HOLIDAYS AND REST DAYS
Section 2 - Rest Days
Service rendered by employees on assigned rest days
shall be paid for under existing call rules unless
relieving an employee assigned to such day, in which case
they will be paid under existing rest-day rules. When
Sunday is one of the rest days, existing rules providing
for compensation on Sunday shall apply. Regular assigned
rest days shall not be changed except after such advance
notice to the employee as is now required under
applicable rules."
It is the conclusion of the Board that there is no basis for
the claim in the Agreement. Rule 20 gives the Carrier some discretion in the establishment of workwe
also gives the Carrier input into the 4 ten-hour day workweek for
gangs such as the one involved. There simply is no language in the
Agreement that prevents the Carrier from making adjustments in days
off once established.
In this case, the Carrier asserted the particular movement
required more than three days. The Organization has not rebutted
this assertion. Moreover, it has not demonstrated how the
Claimants were damaged. They worked 40 hours in each week and
their schedule met the targets of Rule 20 of an assignment with
five consecutive workdays.
Form 1 Award
No.
29663
Page 5 Docket
No.
MW-28494
93-3-88-3-304
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: -
ancy 3/.,~'ever - Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of June, 1993.
J
Vie
~..~'1Vf,!
SEP 2 : 1993
LABOR MEMBER'S DISSENT
TO
THin
U UIV
AWARD 29663. DOCKET MW-28494 -
(Referee Vernon)
The Majority clearly failed in its responsibility to review
and properly render a decision in this docket. The facts were
ignored and the Majority issued its erroneous award to further
deprive the Claimants of their contractual rights. This award is
palpably erroneous and should not be considered as precedent.
While the Majority is correct when it stated that Rule 20
(Forty-Hour Work Week) gives the Carrier some discretion in the
establishment of work weeks and rest days, the issue joined in this
case did not center on the establishment of a work week of a gang,
but the altering of an established gang's work week. Clearly, the
Majority erred when it found that, "*** There simply is no language
in the Agreement that prevents the Carrier from making adjustments
in days off once established." The fact is the gang had an established work week which by bulletin b
Section (i) requires that the work week for regularly assigned
employes shall begin when the assignment is bulletined to work. In
this instance, the regularly assigned employes had a work week of
Monday through Friday with Saturdays and Sundays designated as rest
days. Under the express provisions of Rule 38 (Make-Up Time -
Weekend Visits Home), the gang was permitted to makeup two (2)
hours a day and take off on Friday of each work week to make visits
Labor Member's Dissent
Award 29663
Page Two
to their respective residences. In other words, the beginning of
the bulletined work week could NOT validly be altered by Rule 38,
i.e., it remained Monday irrespective of whether the gang elected
(and was allowed) to makeup time. It stands to reason that Rule 38
contemplated that a gang makeup time first and take it off
afterward, NOT the other way around. Hence, the clear and
unambiguous language of the basic forty-hour work week rule, i.e.,
Rule 20, Section (i), mandates that the beginning of the bulletined
work week is NOT adjustable once the gang is established.
The Majority has based its award on the fact that no time was
lost. It also states that the Carrier has the right to change the
work schedules. Nowhere in the Agreement does the Carrier have the
right to work a gang fifty (50) hours in one week and thirty (30)
hours in the next in order to circumvent paying overtime. The
Carrier was requested to show records to prove that this was not
correct, but never produced those records.
Although the Carrier asserted operational difficulties, it
will be noted that such mitigating factors cannot validly serve to
alter the clear language of Rule 20, Section (i). In any event,
the Majority further erred when it failed to find a demonstration
of how the Claimants were damaged. In this connection, it will b,
Labor Member's Dissent
Award 29663
Page Three
noted that anytime the Carrier's assignments violate the clear
rules of the Agreement, the employes encompassed by said Agreement,
i.e., which include the Claimants involved herein, are damaged by
a diminution of their straight time and/or overtime work opportunities and the monetary benefits acc
Therefore, I dissent.
Respectfully submitted,
D. Bartholomay \
LA
Member