NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29726
Docket No. MW-29440
93-3-90-3-368
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the
Carrier changed the work week of
Work Equipment Mechanic D. R. Hill
from Monday through Thursday with
Friday, Saturday and Sunday as rest
days to a work week of Saturday
through Tuesday with Wednesday,
Thursday and Friday as rest days
effective Saturday, March 18, 1989
(Carrier's File 890582 MPR).
(2) The Agreement was further violated
when the Carrier changed the work
week of Work Equipment Mechanics J.
L. Byrd, K. W. Carson, L. D. Sales
and G. L. Sales from Monday through
Thursday with Friday, Saturday and
Sunday as rest days to a work week
of Saturday through Tuesday with
Wednesday, Thursday and Friday as
rest days effective Saturday, March
25, 1989.
(3) As a consequence of the violation
referred to in Part (1) above,
Claimant D. R. Hill shall be allowed
the difference between straight time
and time and one-half for Saturday
and Sunday work [ten (10) hours
straight time per week] plus payment
of ten (10) hours straight time per
day for Wednesdays and Thursdays
[twenty (20) hours straight time per
week] for a total of thirty (30)
hours straight time per week
beginning Saturday, March 18, 1989
and continuing.
Form 1 Award No. 29726
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29440
93-3-90-3-368
(4) As a consequence of the violation
referred to in Part (2) above,
Claimants J. L. Byrd, K. W. Carson,
L. D. Sales and G. L. Sales shall
each be allowed the difference
between straight time and time and
one-half for Saturday and Sunday
work [ten (10) hours straight time
per week] plus payment of ten (10)
hours straight time per day for
Wednesdays and Thursdays (twenty
(20) hours straight time per week]
for a total of thirty (30) hours
straight time per week beginning
Saturday, March 25, 1989 and
continuing."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The Claimants were members of gangs assigned a workweek of
four 10-hour days as provided under Memorandum Agreement dated
August 7, 1974. Assigned workdays were Monday through Thursday,
with Friday through Sunday as rest days. There is no dispute as to
the original assignment of the Claimants and other affected
employees to the four 10-hour days workweek.
The Memorandum Agreement reads in pertinent part as follows:
"1. At the election of a majority of employes
working in a gang and with the concurrence of
the District Engineer on the District where
such gang is working, a work week of four (4)
days of ten (10) hours may be established with
work week Monday through Thursday, rest days
Friday, Saturday and Sunday. By agreement
between the majority of employes working in
Form 1 Award No. 29726
Page 3 Docket No. MW-29440
93-3-90-3-368
such gang and the said District Engineer,
three other consecutive rest days bay be
substituted therefor
....
11
On January 30, 1989, the Carrier sought to change the workweek
to Saturday through Tuesday, with rest days of Wednesday through
Friday, based on operational needs concerning the availability of
tracks on which work was required. The Carrier demonstrates that
petitions were circulated seeking the employees' approval of the
change, as required by the Memorandum Agreement and that a majority
of the employees signed such petitions. The workweek was thereafter changed as requested.
The Organization's principal contention is that the Claimants,
serving as Mechanics on the gangs, were coerced into agreeing to
the change (four of the five having signed the petition). The
record fails to demonstrate that the employees were prohibited from
indicating their choices freely in the matter. The Carrier's
request was based on reasoned necessity. The Memorandum Agreement
provides for such eventuality. Finally, there was no demonstrated
loss of premium pay, where appropriate, as a result of the change.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:n-~h~- i.~,,: ,
Nancy J. D & - Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of August 1993.