Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29726
Docket No. MW-29440
93-3-90-3-368


(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the

Brotherhood that:




Form 1 Award No. 29726
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29440
93-3-90-3-368
(4) As a consequence of the violation
referred to in Part (2) above,
Claimants J. L. Byrd, K. W. Carson,
L. D. Sales and G. L. Sales shall
each be allowed the difference
between straight time and time and
one-half for Saturday and Sunday
work [ten (10) hours straight time
per week] plus payment of ten (10)
hours straight time per day for
Wednesdays and Thursdays (twenty
(20) hours straight time per week]
for a total of thirty (30) hours
straight time per week beginning
Saturday, March 25, 1989 and
continuing."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.


The Claimants were members of gangs assigned a workweek of four 10-hour days as provided under Memorandum Agreement dated August 7, 1974. Assigned workdays were Monday through Thursday, with Friday through Sunday as rest days. There is no dispute as to the original assignment of the Claimants and other affected employees to the four 10-hour days workweek.




Form 1 Award No. 29726
Page 3 Docket No. MW-29440
93-3-90-3-368
such gang and the said District Engineer,
three other consecutive rest days bay be


On January 30, 1989, the Carrier sought to change the workweek to Saturday through Tuesday, with rest days of Wednesday through Friday, based on operational needs concerning the availability of tracks on which work was required. The Carrier demonstrates that petitions were circulated seeking the employees' approval of the change, as required by the Memorandum Agreement and that a majority of the employees signed such petitions. The workweek was thereafter changed as requested.


The Organization's principal contention is that the Claimants, serving as Mechanics on the gangs, were coerced into agreeing to the change (four of the five having signed the petition). The record fails to demonstrate that the employees were prohibited from indicating their choices freely in the matter. The Carrier's request was based on reasoned necessity. The Memorandum Agreement provides for such eventuality. Finally, there was no demonstrated loss of premium pay, where appropriate, as a result of the change.







Attest:n-~h~- i.~,,: ,
      Nancy J. D & - Secretary to the Board


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 12th day of August 1993.