NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29795
Docket No. MW-30057
93-3-91-3-468
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Dana Edward Eischen when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville
(and Nashville Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the
Carrier assigned junior Assistant Foreman
G. B. Prater instead of Assistant Foreman
D. E. Wilhoit to perform overtime service
flagging for the Speno Ballast Cleaner on
the Cincinnati Subdivision on June 16 and
17, 1990 [System File 1(36)(90)/12(90854) LNR].
(2) As a consequence of the violation
referred to in Part (1) above, Claimant
D. E. Wilhoit shall be paid twenty-seven
(27) hours' pay at his assistant
foreman's time and one-half rate."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The question presented in this case -is whether Carrier
violated Rule 30(g) by assigning Assistant Foreman Prater, who is
junior to Claimant on Gang 5C92, to perform certain work at
overtime rates on the Gang's regular rest days of Saturday-Sunday,
Form 1 Award No. 29795
Page 2 Docket No. MW-30057
93-3-91-3-468
June 16-17, 1990. The work in question was flagging for the Speno
Ballast Cleaner.
Rule 30(g) reads as follows:
"Where work is required by the carrier to be
performed on a day which is not a part of any
assignment, it may be performed by an
available extra or unassigned employee who
will otherwise not have 40 hours of work that
week: in all other cases by the regular
employee."
The record shows that both Claimant and Assistant Foreman
Prater had worked the entire week prior to June 16-17, 1990.
During that workweek, Monday-Friday, June 11-15, 1990, Prater's
sole assigned responsibility was to perform flagging for the Speno
Ballast Cleaner: and Claimant performed no such flagging work
during the regular workweek. Nor is it disputed that flagging for
a ballast cleaner is not work ordinarily and customarily performed
by Claimant during that or any other regular workweek.
For purposes of Rule 30(g), the junior employee who performed
the job as his daily assignment during the preceding workweek was
the "regular employee," within the meaning of that quoted term in
Rule 30(g). See Third Division Awards 29435, 28391, 27090, 28782,
27161 and 26385.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By order of Third Division
`1
Attest:
Catherine Loughrin - Interim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of September 1993.