The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
On December 7, 1988, the Carrier gave notice to the General Chairman of its plan to contract out work of repair and reroofing of a loading dock canopy. Thereafter, such contracted work was undertaken. The organization contends that this is work Form 1 Award No. 29802
"customarily performed" by Maintenance of Way forces and that the work meets none of the exceptions in Rule 52 (a).
There is no doubt, as evidenced by statements provided by the Organization, that roofing work is frequently performed by Carrier forces. However, the Carrier contends and provides documentation to the effect that such work has also frequently been performed by outside contractors, as evidenced in 142 instances. This is one more instance where the existence of such mixed practice points to the application of Rule 52 (b), which reads in pertinent part as follows:
Among other Awards involving the same parties, this principle is supported by Third Division Award 28610.