NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29926
Docket No. CL-30207
93-3-91-3-666



(Transportation Communications International
(Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
(Company






T. M. Forsyth 6101 $106.45 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
K. E. Bell 6037 106.42 per day 930a-630p Sat-Sun
A. L. Teague 6116 106.42 per day 7a-4p Sat-Sun
D. L. Kennedy 6089 110.38 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
F. N. Kerley 6076 108.10 per day 9a-6p Sat-Sun
H. W. Crawford 6035 106.42 per day 6a-2p Sat-Sun
V. C. Calvery 6090 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
B. P. Walls 6099 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
W. E. Whitworth 6036 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
Form 1 Award No. 29926
Page 2 Docket No.CL-30207
93-3-91-3-666
M. L. Whitt 6110 105.26 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
A. B. Row 6142 108.10 per day 7a-4p Sat-Sun
J. H. Stevenson 6115 91.85 per day 730a-430p Sat-Sun
C. S. Capps 6038 106.42 per day 2p-10p Sat-Sun
E. J. Foster 6117 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
B. C. Gilmore 6103 106.42 per day lla-8p Sat-Sun
H. D. Hanks 6501 102.42 per day Various Various
H. L. Carson 5000 118.33 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
J. 0. Vincent 6121 106.42 per day 7a-3p Sat-Sun
R. D. Whitaker 6124 106.42 per day llp-7a Sat-Sun
T. R. Sander 6408 102.42 per day Various Various
J. W. Walker 9206 106.42 per day Various Thu-Fri
R. E. Lucas 6120 106.42 per day 7a-3p Sat-Sun
T. L. Smith 6106 99.85 per day 9a-6p Sat-Sun
E. H. Sutte 6122 106.42 per day 930a-630p Sat-Sun
L. D. Helto 6123 106.42 per day 3p-11p Sat-Sun
S. L. Madewll 6118 106.42 per day 3p-llp Tue-Wed
B. L. Reeves 5001 118.33 per day 3p-lip Sat-Sun
E. E. Bayer 3003 3012.24 per mo. Various Various
B. R. Roesler 6407 102.42 per day Various Various
B. L. Collins 6410 102.42 per day Various Various


CLAIM NO 2:


Form 1 Award No. 29926
Page 3 Docket No.CL-30207
93-3-91-3-666
NAM POs. NUMBER RATE OF PAY HOURS RESTDAYS
T. M. Forsyth 6101 $106.45 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
K. E. Bell 6037 106.42 per day 9308-630p Sat-Sun
A. L. Teague 6116 106.42 per day 7a-4p Sat-Sun
D. L. Kennedy 6089 110.38 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
F. N. Kerley 6076 108.10 per day 9a-6p Sat-Sun
H. W. Crawford 6035 106.42 per day 6a-2p Sat-Sun
V. C. Calvery 6090 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
B. P. Walls 6099 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
W. E. Whitworth 6036 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
M. L. Whitt 6110 105.26 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
A. B. Row 6142 108.10 per day 7a-4p Sat-Sun
J. H. Stevenson 6115 91.85 per day 7308-430p Sat-Sun
C. S. Capps 6038 106.42 per day 2p-10p Sat-Sun
E. J. Foster 6117 106.42 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
B. C. Gilmore 6103 106.42 per day lla-8p Sat-Sun
H. D. Hanks 6501 102.42 per day Various Various
H. L. Carson 5000 118.33 per day 8a-5p Sat-Sun
J. 0. Vincent 6121 106.42 per day 7a-3p Sat-Sun
R. D. Whitaker 6124 106.42 per day llp-7a Sat-Sun
T. R. Sander 6408 102.42 per day Various Various
J. W. Walker 9206 106.42 per day Various Thu-Fri
R. E. Lucas 6120 106.42 per day 7a-3p Sat-Sun
T. L. Smith 6106 99.85 per day 9a-6p Sat-Sun
E. H. Sutte 6122 106.42 per day 9308-630p Sat-Sun
L. D. Helto 6123 106.42 per day 3p-llp Sat-Sun
S. L. Madewll 6118 106.42 per day 3p-llp Tue-Wed
B. L. Reeves 5001 118.33 per day 3p-11p Sat-Sun
E. E. Bayer 3003 3012.24 per mo. Various Various
B. R. Roesler 6407 102.42 per day Various Various
B. L. Collins 6410 102.42 per day various Various


Form 1 Award No. 29926
Page 4 Docket No.CL-30207
93-3-91-3-666

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.


Effective May 15, 1989, Carrier relocated its Texas Division Offices from one location to another within the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area. Following the relocation, all of the Claimant's were working their same positions within the same seniority district, except that they were working point. The Organization argues that the positions should have been rebulletined. It contends that a failure to rebulletin the jobs was in violation of Rule 11 as well as a departure from past practice. The Organization has not made a persuasive showing Rule 11 is applicable in this matter. Additionally, it has not demonstrated that an existing past practice is in place which would require the carrier to rebulletin the positions of Claimants when the location of the jobs was moved from one headquarters point in the same metropolitan area to another. Moreover, it has not pointed to a Rule in the Agreement which prohibits Carrier from relocating positions within the metropolitan area of a single seniority district, the situation here.






      Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


Attest:
      Catherine Loughri Interim Secretary to the Board


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of December 1993.