NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 29934
Docket No. MW-29534
93-3-90-3-476
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier, on
June 6, 7 and 8, 1989, assigned employes covered by
the MKT Agreement to perform track work on the Red
River Division between Mile Posts 126 and 127 in
the vicinity of Bonham, Texas which is territory
covered by the Missouri Pacific Agreement (Carrier's File 890694 MPR).
(2) As a consequence of the aforesaid violation, Red
River Division Foreman E. E. Exum, Assistant
Foreman
L. B.
Sasser, Trackman Driver B. M. Talbott
and Trackman H. O. Beaty shall each be allowed
twenty-four (24) hours of pay at their respective
straight time rates and three (3) hours of pay at
their respective time and one-half overtime rates."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The Organization contends, and the Carrier concedes, that it
assigned extra gang forces from the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad
to "perform work related to a washout" within the Red River Division's seniority territory. The Orga
employees holding such seniority.
Form 1 Award No. 29934
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29534
93-3-90-3-476
Rule 30, Emergency Service, states in pertinent part as
follows:
"Men temporarily employed during periods of floods,
washouts, snow blockades, and fires will not be
considered as coming under the provision of this
Agreement."
The reference to use of non-Agreement personnel in the case of
"washouts", as here, would appear to dispose of the matter. The
Organization makes some contention that it was necessary for the
Carrier to demonstrate that an "emergency" condition existed. The
admitted "washout" condition meets the Rule 30 "emergency" definition. If further proof is required,
that the Claimants were themselves working extra hours in
connection with "washout" conditions.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest: ~.--~'--~`"S~`-'
Catherine Loughrin - interim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of December 1993.