NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 30018
Docket No. MW-30117
94-3-91-3-547
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert W. McAllister when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Chesapeake
(and Ohio Railway Company - Northern Region)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier withheld Trackman J. Burch from service beginnin
9 through 13, 1990 [System File C-TC-7098/12(901022) CON].
(2) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier withheld Trackman R. Kaczmarczyk from service be
July 23 through 27, 1990 [System File C-TC-7080/12
(90-962) CON].
(3) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (1) above, Trackman J. Burch shall be allowed
forty (40) hours' pay at his trackman's straight
time rate of pay.
(4) As a consequence of the violation referred to in
Part (2) above, Trackman R. Kaczmarczyk shall be
allowed forty (40) hours' pay at his trackman's
straight time rate of pay."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 30018
Page 2 Docket No. MW-30117
94-3-91-3-547
In January 1990, the Carrier sent its furloughed Maintenance
of Way employees the necessary forms for obtaining return-to-work
physical examinations. This mailing was in anticipation of the
force build up for the spring production season. Although the
Claimants received these forms, they did not take their physical
examinations, nor were they recalled in the spring.
Claimant Burch was sent a recall letter on June 29, 1990,
advising him to report for service on July 9, 1990. It appears
from the record that the Claimant then arranged to take his returnto-work physical. When he reported
however, he was told to return home until the physical was approved
by the Carriers Medical Department. Claimant Burch commenced
service on July 16, 1990.
Claimant Kaczmarczyk was notified on July 13, 1990, to report
for service on July 23, 1990. He scheduled his physical for July
20, 1990, but was not permitted to begin work until July 30, 1990,
after his physical was approved.
This claim seeks compensation for the Claimants for the time
between the date they reported for service as directed and the date
upon which they actually commenced work.
In addition to the Rules governing the recall of forces, the
parties have an Agreement dated July 29, 1988, identified as CSXT
Labor Agreement 6-076-88, which governs the identification, evaluation, and rehabilitation of employ
while subject to or on duty. Section 3 of this Agreement provides
as follows:
"Drug and alcohol urine screening also shall
be required as part of a reinstatement
physical examination. Also, any employee
furloughed continuously for more than ninety
(90) calendar days may be required to take a
return to work physical prior to his or her
return to work. Such employees will be so
notified using the Notice attached hereto as
Appendix D. If the employee, because of
previous CSXT instructions, has previously
taken and passed a physical within sixty (60)
days of the return to work date, then the
employee will not be required to repeat the
physical."
Appendix D is a notice to the employees advising them of the
need for a physical examination prior to returning to work. It is
Form 1 Award No. 30018
Page 3 Docket No. MW-30117
94-3-91-3-547
this notice that the claimants received in January 1990. The
notice reads as follows:
"This letter will serve as formal notice of
your requirement to submit to a physical
examination prior to your return to work
pursuant to Section 3 of the Agreement concerning drug and/or alcohol testing between
CSX Transportation, Inc., and its employees
represented by the Brotherhood of Maintenance
of Way Employes.
Please arrange to promptly secure an appointment for the required examination from one of
the physicians on the enclosed list in order
to complete your return to work physical
examination. The enclosed form MED-2 must be
furnished to the examining physician at the
time of the examination. You may be required,
as part of this physical examination to provide the necessary urine samples to the examining physici
of drugs and/alcohol. All drug and/or alcohol
testing and the results thereof shall be
handled in accordance with the provisions of
Section 4 and urine samples shall be obtained
from the employees in accordance with the
procedures set forth in Appendix 'C' of the
Agreement referred to hereinabove.
Only employees furloughed continuously for
more than ninety (90) calendar days and those
who have not taken and passed another CSXT
special or return to work physical examination
by the medical department within this current
furloughed period will be required to submit
to this physical examination. If you have
previously completed a CSXT special or return
to work physical examination within this current furloughed period, please fill out the
attached form and return it to CSXT."
The Carrier argues the Claimants had an opportunity to take
their physicals prior to being recalled. Had they done so, the
Carrier asserts they would have been prepared to return to work on
the dates stated in their recall notices. During the handling of
this dispute on the property, however, the Carrier conceded the
Claimants would have been required to take a second physical had
Form 1 Award No. 30018
Page 4 Docket No. MW-30117
94-3-91-3-547
their first examinations been more than three months prior to their
recall.
Given the applicable Rules, this Board finds that even if the
Rule governing the recall of forces required the Carrier to start
employees on the first day of the recall, that requirement would
have been superseded by Section 3 of Agreement 6-076-88. Under
that Agreement, the Carrier has the right to examine furloughed
employees who have been recalled to service. That right carries
with it the right to withhold an employee from service until it is
determined he or she had successfully completed the examination.
The Board in numerous past Awards has recognized that the Carrier
has an obligation to process examinations expeditiously, avoiding
unreasonable delay. We find no such delay in this case. The
Agreement, therefore, was not violated.
The Carrier had no obligation to allow the Claimants to take
their physical examinations as early as January. This obviously is
done for the employees' convenience, allowing them to begin work as
soon as the jobs go on. The Carrier benefits, as well, by having
a ready work force when the production season starts. This system
seems to be adequate for employees who get recalled in the spring.
In the Claimants' case, however, an early examination probably
would have been useless because they would have been required to
submit to a second examination.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
~U-~-
Catherine Loughrin - Ifterim secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of January 1994.