NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Form 1 THIRD DIVISION Award No. 30087
Docket No. MW-29310
94-3-90-3-212
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Charlotte Gold when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System of Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
1. The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
assigned System Rail No. 9109 instead of
Arkansas Division employes to perform switch
construction and installation work in the
vicinities of Gurdon, Prescott and Hope,
Arkansas on February 4, 5, 11, 12, 18, 19,
March 4, 5, il, 12, 18 and 19, 1989 (Carrier's
File 890249 MPR).
2. As a consequence of the aforesaid violation,
the Arkansas Division employes listed below*
shall each be allowed ninety-six (96) hours of
pay at their respective time and one-half
rates.
"*R. Franks Foreman
E.L. Harris Asst. Foreman
O.C. Jackson Trackman Driver
L. Hendrix Trackman
E.E. Brown "
D. L. Hunter "
F. L. Kinder
W.R. Black "
A.J. Kelley
G.E. Vincent
R.E. Roush "
S. D. Cline "
G.A. Wheeler "
C.H. Burrows "
T.W. Barnett
L. Hunter Trackman"
Form 1 Award No. 30087
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29310
94-3-90-3-212
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
This claim was filed on April 3, 1989, on behalf of sixteen
Arkansas Division employees for ninety-six hours of pay at the time
and one-half rate. In dispute was the work of building switches on
the right-of-way and installation in the main line by a System Rail
Gang in Prescott and Hope, Arkansas, between February 4 and March
19, 1989.
This Board finds the facts and arguments in this case to be
similar to those in Third Division Awards 29977 and 30086. It was
concluded in those two cases that the organization did not meet the
burden of proof that was required of it to prevail. We so hold in
this instance.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Catherine Loughrin
-U
nterim Secretary to the Board
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 15th day of March 1994.