The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant is the incumbent of a Traveling Clerk position headquartered at Boone, Iowa. The hours of assignment for the Traveling Clerk position are 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. with rest days on Sundays and Mondays. Position Relief No. 004 protects claimant's job on its rest days.
On Sunday, March 5, 1989, the Extra Board Clerk who was working Relief Position No. 004 called before the start of the shift to inform the carrier that she would be tardy to work that morning. At about 10:00 a.m., the Extra Board Clerk called again and said that, due to child care difficulties, she would be unable Form 1 Award No. 30105
to protect her assignment. Since the regularly assigned employee on Position No. 29, which worked from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. had already marked off due to illness, the Carrier officer directed the Extra Board Clerk to make herself available to fill the Position No. 29 vacancy at 10:00 p.m. later that Sunday. She complied.
The carrier did not attempt to fill Relief Position No. 004 and none of the duties of the position were performed. In essence, the Traveling Clerk job was blanked.
The organization filed a claim alleging that the Carrier should have called Claimant on his rest day to fill Relief Position No. 004. According to the Organization, the Carrier diverted the Extra Board Clerk from her regular job (Relief Position No. 004) to fill the third shift vacancy and thus, Claimant was entitled to be called, at the overtime rate, to fill the Relief Position pursuant to the Understanding following Rule 9. Rules 9(f) and 9(g) along with the Understanding read:
The express language of the Understanding to Rule 9 demonstrates that the provision is applicable if the position is to be filled at the overtime rate. Nothing in the Understanding mandates the Carrier to fill a single-day vacancy, such as Relief Position No. 004, so long as the Carrier does not reassign the duties of the job. Contrary to the Organization's assertion, the evidence indicates that the Extra Board Clerk marked off of the relief assignment as opposed to being diverted from the assignment at the Carrier's behest. The Carrier only instructed her to fill the third shift regular assignment vacated by an ill employee after the Extra Board Clerk had notified the Carrier that she was unable to work her relief position.