The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
This Claim is similar to that considered in Third Division Award 30042 in that it involves the use of a Signal Maintainer from one seniority district (District No. 9) to perform work in another seniority district (District No. 3). Such work involved the use of a boom truck, driven from District No. 9 to a location in District No. 3, where signal equipment was picked up and then delivered to another District No. 3 location. The Organization contends that the District No. 9 employee "installed" the equipment on location, but this is contested by the Carrier. The Claim is on behalf of a Form 1 Award No. 30112
District No. 3 Signal Maintainer, claiming infringement on work within the seniority district.
During the Claim handling on the property, the Carrier stated that neither the Claimant nor any other available District No. 3
employee had the necessary license to qualify for operating the boom truck. This was not contradicted thereafter. On this basis alone, the Claimant is clearly without appropriate standing to claim the work. Further, as in Third Division Award 30042, the Board finds no Rule violation as to the boom truck operation which originated in District No. 9. Proof is lacking as to the truck driver's participation in "installing" the equipment.